Trust me the government is even more prepared to shit like that than you imagine. And I am talking about Canada here so I don't even want to imagine the US

@Laucivol are you an oath keeper or have any feelings about them?

Oath keepers are gay as well tbh

@Sarahdale the key is to attack the government before you have a reason to

Then they are less prepared

"look at me brandishing my firearms woooo"

No, and I'm uninformed on the matter. @Louis

@Laucivol ok

@Storin u have successfully triggered me, but i feel ur are trolling

There is no way U.S. citizen soldiers are going to gun down civilians while the govt. is in breech of the constitution.

Dude as someone who has seen when shit gets real everyone thinks they have a pair of balls till they don't- and then I laugh at them <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

@A Big Gay Baby sure buddy.

@Tubby the Skelly Bones that would be correct for many middle east countries. But vastly inaccurate here

would you?

Quick search, I've heard of them before.. but that's about the length of it.

@Storin blackpilled

Western militaries will NEVER be used to occupy their own countries tbh- the ethics training means they will never pull the trigger on their own people, the police on the other hand...

Also, Applebee's instead of Denny's.

@Storin I was thinking of strapping explosives and chemical weapons to yourself and rigging them to go off when your heart stops.

Instead of brandishing firearms

I mean, sure why not, im down, if it im dead I wont care <:shrug:349342983763656705>

The entire reason the EU wants an army is to get troops from one country to put down rebellions in another.

Exactly

@Laucivol they refuse orders that violate the constitution. Like real concentration camps and gun confiscation without reason.

That's the gist.

Militaries don't supress their own people and tbh in such a revolution it is likely the military will side with the people and the police with the govt

Hence the oath you took in basic @Laucivol

The British always did that which is why we are not called the "royal" army

They keep that oath

@Storin October 1970 in Quebec would disagree

@Storin lol no

British people would be slaughtered

did canada do something naughty?

Yea, we lost the royal affix as a "disgrace" for our treason in the civil war

I made an oath, I will keep it. Is where I stand on that matter. @Louis

Siding with cromwell <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

tbh i wonder why canada even has an army

Any military who suppresses their own people was never for the people to begin with

cromwell was the good guy

@Laucivol than you are an oath keeper by definition.

well it depends on the military