Message from @svarozhyc
Discord ID: 651913722377535534
Not real person, delusion of a relationship, and obsession with.
So you're saying you're obsessed with Shakira?
y not
I am not.
Obsession isn't necessarily, just the conceptualization.
Liar.
you could keep her eyes in lil formaldehyde pots
lol
That escalated quickly.
have them around when things get tough you can look in her eyes and - in a way, as eyes are the mirrors of the soul - be with her
Why bracketize "she" ? If the person isn't a she, it's not a waifu. It would be a husbando. If you ascribe to more than two genders, you're wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_O_Vgq7vkk Guess this will suffice
That is indeed a way to use pronouns.
Again, why bracketize it?
when they still move they're very... awkward?
move around make a mess
damage themselves
better keep em in jars
Since I used quotes in the hypothetical statement, instead of being "she" it'd be the individual's name.
The word "she" is not itself a variable item that can be replaced with other words, if you're trying to be programmatic about it.
Rather, I *am* being programmatic about it.
cryo is just sayin 'u gae'
Which I used the brackets to indicate. XD
Then you're presenting an improper program sense. Again, "she" cannot be replaced in the sentence with other words. Such as "he." Because only she applies.
Yes, the word she can be replaced by a proper noun.
application will be reviewed in due course
dismissed
Which was my point.
Which is how pronouns work inherently. Again, you're overcomplicating a matter.
So neener neener.
My prerogative.
Any pronoun you use *could* be replaced with a proper noun.
it wasnt a she it was the she you see
As svarozhyc says.
will this do?
NA, real whamen only
Because the statement without the brackets didn't express the *personalized* nature of the matter in hand.
Still didn't.