Message from @[ｓｏａｔ]
Discord ID: 652286662897958923
what even is reno 911
is it a movie?
a tv show?
Oh yeah, but boggs was a heinous rapist
nah, he got them short shorts on
@OneTrueGod i didn't really mean in that specific instance, just in general
reno 911 is both a show and a movie
started as show
I always felt bad for that one guy in the beginning
eventually got a movie, possibly 2 movies
True but that scene was cathartic
boggs thought he was untouchable, he wasn't
i see
when i see cop gifts i have trouble distinguishing
between reno 911 and police academy
theyre similar things yes?
I don't know much about reno
reno 911 was more like a parody of the live action/reality 'cops
Andy Dufresne crawled through a river of shit and came out clean on the other side
Police academy was good, all of them
I always felt bad for the other guy too
The younger guy who gets shot
could be worse
he could be brett
Hey everyone, ill be streaming with Charlemagne in about an hour. We will be discussing Moldbug's new articles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPpvfdC_eZI
Best banana split ever
He knows he doesn't have a chance in hell. At least he's having a good time.
@Louis, I'd prefer to see a confederacy like the United States come into birth than what's going on now. Expansion of government seems to be the cycle of all States, but it will be their design that enables restrain, bureaucratic obstruction, and the ability to contract, which is by design in the U.S. just as it is under the proposed system of government the SDF is pursuing. Each autonomous reserves the ability to self-govern, but there are fundamental rights secured by the federal body that will remain, such as free speech, the right to self-preservation in the ownership of firearms, etc. If you are to say this isn't a viable model, then you'd be directly abandoning the very model the United States is and always has been.
Attitude towards women? That they have the same rights as the men in their society? I don't see your issue, here. Money? What about it? As with the early-birth of the United States, States had their own coinage, as we were once a confederacy. They will go down the same path as the United States. They spend their days fighting and terminating Islamist fighters, just as they had in Aleppo and plenty of other battlefronts they spent their time advancing on, so I don't know what you're talking about here.
As it relates to Socialism, they're not centralists, rather they're functioning the way we did in the early-birth of our nation, with autonomous communities that lacked currency and had common ownership, later abandoned when it got in the way of economic scalability and efficiency, where bartering and the "you help me repair my roof, I help you repair your cabinetry" is the predominant theme. It's not like the Socialism we see as leading to Communism and centralism. It's not managed by any central government, that's what you don't seem to delineate between. It's more like the Zapatistas of Mexico, which operate in a highly similar fashion, though less advanced, to how we did.
Nah it's the guy who claims to have talked to the guy that is responsible for the murders Dufresne was jailed for and when Dufresne goes to the warden about it and threatens to reveal the money laundering that the warden forces him to do, the warden lures the guy outside and has the guard captain shoot him down and then cover it up as an attempted escape @Lucienne d'Anwyl
Pretty fucked
i c
my state is pretty based
@Louis, correct; it was very much like a primitive, anarchist model in the beginning, but we know that wasn't permanent, because human social behavior is determine by utility to satisfy physiological needs and wants, the very reason efficiency was a natural pursuit by enjoining ourselves into a Union by way of ratifying a constitution. We did, however, retain a great deal of that anarchic sentiment in it, however, to serve keeping alive the spirit of liberty.
As for the public outlook on the guard of oil, ensuring the taps remain open, while uncaptured by either the centralists or ISIS, you'd find our adversaries promote the false-narrative that the U.S. is there to extract oil, when we're not. We're there for the reasons I've outlined previously, which is part of countering what remains to be a Soviet grand-strategy that's survived long after its collapse. What this does is demoralizes public opinion, manipulating their perception of U.S. foreign policy to force a withdrawal, while cultivating an insurgency that'll act against it.
Europe is not our lap dog, and I expect them to act within their interests, as they should, but falling under the control of the PRC or Federation isn't an option, simply because we've some technical disputes over market-access for some of our technology firms. At the end of the day, we're cut from the same cloth, and in a world where the U.S. gives up, totalitarians will dictate the future course of life on this planet, the most unAmerican thing you could do.
Why the walls of text?
@Jeremy PETRO DOLLAR