Message from @Jamec
Discord ID: 652467369393913857
Because
they have no EXPERTISE
They aren't that bad, it's the environment, like I keep saying
They are boomer youtubers
They're still doing more than most anyone else
tumours?
Even if it ain't much
Tim covers topics that are more important at least to me then Sargon does
Yes and the opposition is doing more because they immerse within the depths of their subject <:shrug:349342983763656705>
But I do find Tim's voice a little annoying and that's saying something as I'm subscribed to fucking =V=
Hence why vaush beat out sargon on a purely knowledge based look at their debate
Well they have the establishment behind them
And I wonder if sargon read the things he linked tbh
Allot easier to make in depth content when your income is guaranteed
Sargon has the knowledge it just wasn't mentally at his disposal
if they tried to pull that drag time story shit here , dont know what would happen
"Although Benjamin claims the mantle of "skeptic", his commentary often features theories of a rather more conspiratorial nature (in particular, concerning Cultural Marxism), [5] and potentially disingenuous sourcing: often overlooking critical passages, long words and graphs which might cause head scratching."
Because he's passive and Vasuh is a loud mouthed obnoxious communist
Wait you think vaush won? Rofl
Now I know your a troll
Yea I do, Vaush knew the subject they were talking about and sargon got caught on definitions and "but I didn't say that did I"
He lost <:shrug:349342983763656705>
is that from wiki pep?
Vaush won the argument but lost the debate because his behavior, the way he won made chat fucking ***hate*** him
Rationalwiki
the best wiki
Eww
Rationalwiki
Disgusting
conspiracies are a real thing
Epstein
Wait
this isn't the Wiki I wanted
“”I’ve said, over and over, that Milo, Sargon, Lauren Souther[sic], and Gavin types people[sic] can be great entry points
—Richard Spencer, white supremacist leader
I'm sorry
Conspiracies ranging from ***Epstein to Goldstein***
"Rationalwiki"
If you can present a better argument for why the earth is flat and the dude who is supposed to say its round says "well is it flat though" or "I didn't say it was a full circle" then the dude who says its flat wins- that is how debate works, doesn't mean the "correct" person will win but the one who presents the better angle and more studies to their argument