Message from @Kealor

Discord ID: 655111913839263784


2019-12-13 18:19:41 UTC  

but it isnt possible right now

2019-12-13 18:19:51 UTC  

and youd also hav to do away with decades worth of ethics bills

2019-12-13 18:19:53 UTC  

You don't just need smart people... you need strong, brave, etc...

2019-12-13 18:19:55 UTC  

I'm not implying you did, I just think it's a better final solution

2019-12-13 18:20:00 UTC  

We need to gene edit human gut flora

2019-12-13 18:20:05 UTC  

@w3w3w3 is right too

2019-12-13 18:20:05 UTC  

@Lucienne d'Anwyl someone didnt pay attention to the new

2019-12-13 18:20:06 UTC  

big-brains have a notorious failing when it comes to not anticipating unforeseen consequences

2019-12-13 18:20:13 UTC  

smart people may be useful but they could be killed easily and lose it all from strong and pyscho/brave people

2019-12-13 18:20:14 UTC  

Mr. Friedman

2019-12-13 18:20:14 UTC  

lol

2019-12-13 18:20:14 UTC  

You need people of differing skill sets and abilities

2019-12-13 18:20:16 UTC  

Basically that GMA

2019-12-13 18:20:19 UTC  

notso smart then are they

2019-12-13 18:20:22 UTC  

That is why you will never get me on board

2019-12-13 18:20:31 UTC  

@w3w3w3 what if you're smart and strong

2019-12-13 18:20:36 UTC  

China created new human beings, who are immune to HIV (and are also incidentally slightly smarter because the gene that was edited, was associated with intelligence)

2019-12-13 18:20:41 UTC  
2019-12-13 18:20:48 UTC  

Usually you would try adn create smart people and lose something else that is vaulable

2019-12-13 18:20:49 UTC  

Already not a fan of abortion and you want to go one step further and make what is essentially designer babies? Nah mate, keep that nike shit to shoes not babies <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-12-13 18:20:51 UTC  

@Lucienne d'Anwyl do you feel that the benefits of traditional eugenics outweigh the compromise to classical liberalism
(if you answer no to that that might clear up alot of the moral fagging here)

2019-12-13 18:20:53 UTC  

Eugenics would mean removing fatal genetic diseases from populations, not producing superhumans or other fantastical ideas

2019-12-13 18:20:55 UTC  

@Storin society already practices a base level of eugenics

2019-12-13 18:20:56 UTC  

Pig people?

2019-12-13 18:20:57 UTC  

for example

2019-12-13 18:21:03 UTC  

you wouldnt fuck someone with down syndrome

2019-12-13 18:21:06 UTC  

@Fenririri citation? Sorta interested to read

2019-12-13 18:21:07 UTC  

no such animal Saul

2019-12-13 18:21:13 UTC  

You would not want a baby with a downie

2019-12-13 18:21:15 UTC  

you likely wouldnt fuck someone with a major birth defect

2019-12-13 18:21:20 UTC  

this is eugenics like or not

2019-12-13 18:21:23 UTC  

there are such things as mutual exclusions in the human condition

2019-12-13 18:21:29 UTC  

and it keeps bloodlines from becoming contaminated with major disorders

2019-12-13 18:21:30 UTC  

Just like a white person having a baby with a black girl and the baby coming out black and looking nothing like them must surely be GUTTED

2019-12-13 18:21:31 UTC  

lol

2019-12-13 18:21:39 UTC  

@Storin not brave new world, but adult gene therapy and editing

2019-12-13 18:21:45 UTC  

@Saul I am kinda pissed off right now, so I am not going to bother searching for a sauce, if that's alright with you.

2019-12-13 18:21:49 UTC  

Aint on board dude <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-12-13 18:21:50 UTC  

Editing your own genes sounds good

2019-12-13 18:21:52 UTC  

etc

2019-12-13 18:21:54 UTC  

if possible