Message from @w3w3w3
Discord ID: 655112003731456010
smart people may be useful but they could be killed easily and lose it all from strong and pyscho/brave people
Mr. Friedman
lol
You need people of differing skill sets and abilities
Basically that GMA
notso smart then are they
That is why you will never get me on board
China created new human beings, who are immune to HIV (and are also incidentally slightly smarter because the gene that was edited, was associated with intelligence)
Usually you would try adn create smart people and lose something else that is vaulable
Already not a fan of abortion and you want to go one step further and make what is essentially designer babies? Nah mate, keep that nike shit to shoes not babies <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
@Lucienne d'Anwyl do you feel that the benefits of traditional eugenics outweigh the compromise to classical liberalism
(if you answer no to that that might clear up alot of the moral fagging here)
Eugenics would mean removing fatal genetic diseases from populations, not producing superhumans or other fantastical ideas
@Storin society already practices a base level of eugenics
Pig people?
for example
you wouldnt fuck someone with down syndrome
@Fenririri citation? Sorta interested to read
no such animal Saul
you likely wouldnt fuck someone with a major birth defect
this is eugenics like or not
there are such things as mutual exclusions in the human condition
and it keeps bloodlines from becoming contaminated with major disorders
Just like a white person having a baby with a black girl and the baby coming out black and looking nothing like them must surely be GUTTED
lol
@Saul I am kinda pissed off right now, so I am not going to bother searching for a sauce, if that's alright with you.
Aint on board dude <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>
Editing your own genes sounds good
etc
if possible
Imagine wasting our genetic mastery on curing diseases there are better uses
or even better
robotic limbs/lungs
Keep your clone troopers to your self <:PepeL:625351341656506378>
@Kealor i mean i honestly could care
/heart etc
It's more moral to remove a dysgenic trait from the population via eugenics then to allow it to pollute the population
so can live for a long time