they have a genetic resistance to malaria

which is eugenics 101

@Lucienne d'Anwyl n

white people have a genetic resistance to typhoid fever

Africans have an IQ of around 60 lol

There's no E in CRISPR CAS-9

@Lucienne d'Anwyl and an higher risk of sickle cell anaemia

and an intolerace for malaria

Lets build a big wall and forgot they ever exsisted

which is why africa is so backwards

it takes a lot longer to develop resistances to diseases than it does to simply enhance traits though

@Hexidecimark my bad

Thing is though you wont get me on board with that shite. As I said some people are just supposed to be bigger, stronger, and/or smarter. The moment you start fucking with that shit you might as well roll out the clones and do away with all you cunts <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

@Lucienne d'Anwyl why when you can get gene edit?

And me actually 🤔

I agree, Storin

i didnt say gene editing was bad

but it isnt possible right now

and youd also hav to do away with decades worth of ethics bills

You don't just need smart people... you need strong, brave, etc...

I'm not implying you did, I just think it's a better final solution

We need to gene edit human gut flora

@w3w3w3 is right too

@Lucienne d'Anwyl someone didnt pay attention to the new

big-brains have a notorious failing when it comes to not anticipating unforeseen consequences

smart people may be useful but they could be killed easily and lose it all from strong and pyscho/brave people

Mr. Friedman

lol

You need people of differing skill sets and abilities

Basically that GMA

notso smart then are they

That is why you will never get me on board

@w3w3w3 what if you're smart and strong

China created new human beings, who are immune to HIV (and are also incidentally slightly smarter because the gene that was edited, was associated with intelligence)

@Lucienne d'Anwyl

Usually you would try adn create smart people and lose something else that is vaulable

Already not a fan of abortion and you want to go one step further and make what is essentially designer babies? Nah mate, keep that nike shit to shoes not babies <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

@Lucienne d'Anwyl do you feel that the benefits of traditional eugenics outweigh the compromise to classical liberalism
(if you answer no to that that might clear up alot of the moral fagging here)

Eugenics would mean removing fatal genetic diseases from populations, not producing superhumans or other fantastical ideas

@Storin society already practices a base level of eugenics