Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 617050254004584449
what
god, you're as hungry for attention as that e-girl was
I don't think National Socialism is the only worldview that promotes hierarchy, but i know you communist strasserite faggots want "equality" in accordance with your communistic worldview. Going against our biology and making us interact in a way we are not "made" to interact in is like making a saw screw nails, you're retarded and gay.
Nah, it's not, you'll have to elaborate on how that is the same if you actually believe that. Either way, it doesn't actually attack what i said, you are just equating it with a retarded thing you made up, which since you are a strasserite, is something you're pretty good at.
The industrial revolution is a tool that has been abused by first Capitalists and then Communists. If we take our nature into consideration, i see no reason why it cannot be a force of objective good for ourselves and the ecology.
Nah, i don't want to be dominated by corporations, i'm not a Capitalist or a Fascist. The Corperation as an organization is objectively a good tool for us, but it is wielded by Capitalists who want egotistical pleasure and not what is best for the people. Make the people who are running corporations care for their people more than their belly and cock, and you make a healthy and natural modern society. And if they don't want to, you can always kill those traitors.
I'm not a strasserist
`The industrial revolution is a tool that has been abused by first Capitalists and then Communists. If we take our nature into consideration, i see no reason why it cannot be a force of objective good for ourselves and the ecology.`
>thinks it can be a force of good
Fucking liberal
you're nazbol
Typical Shitlerlite
>The Corperation as an organization is objectively a good tool for us
I wonder how much he actually knows about biology
Good lord you are cucked
@Deleted User A lack of economic class is not a lack of hierarchy
Did hunter gatherer tribes lack fucking hierarchy
That's your problem
you see economic hierarchy as the *only* hierarchy
The system can't be reformed, it must be destroyed from the ground up
National socialism, as edgy as it tries to be, is ultimately just a more violent way of reforming the system
Not actually solving the problem
It seeks to bring the wealthy within orbit of the state through force
Force isn't the bad thing here
how is massing a wide portion of individual with different complementary qualities which they have all worked on not a tool of good?
Hunter gatherer tribes didn't have classes because they didn't have professions you fucking retard. The only reason we have classes is because we focus on one thing, and then trade with others to get our means of survival. In hunter gatherer societies, all had to participate in all fields to survive. They didn't have class, but they did have hierarchy. If you want to get rid of classes, you also have to get rid of what is causing a class structure, which is the profession economy and returning to self sustainability like Varg.
`Hunter gatherer tribes didn't have classes because they didn't have professions you fucking retard. The only reason we have classes is because we focus on one thing, and then trade with others to get our means of survival. In hunter gatherer societies, all had to participate to survive. They didn't have class, but they did have hierarchy. `
No shit sherlock, they didn't have professions
How are you oblivious to the fact that this was my point?
>You're a fucking retard, let me explain to you why you're right, idiot. God, so stupid!
I can't wait for him to run out of arguments and resort to "OMG UR A JEW"
>
then you should've said you didn't want a profession economy instead of you don't want a class structure, because as far as i am aware, communist trannies like yourself do want industry. How should i have known you were a cringy cityboy who want to return to homesteadism with his virgin aryan anime character
The point was an absence of economic class does not mean an absence of social hierarchy, which you yourself just proved. There are always people who are more fit to lead than others.
You were arguing earlier that it was, despite what you will say next
And now you just showed that not to be the case
@Deleted User Go back to hanging out with your maga buddies and based Mexicans. You're a fake nationalist.
yeah not necessarily. I don't know if you actually do agree with me on this, or if you just changed your position to save face, but your comment didn't imply that. You said "A lack of economic class is not a lack of hierarchy", how the fuck am i supposed to know that you actually meant professions and not economic classes, when you said economic classes.
at least i am actually a nationalist
That is what I said
How did I change positions
Literally nothing I said has anything to do with me wanting professions or not
Did the Soviet Union have economic class? No.
Did it lack professions? Also no.
@Deleted User
you never said you didn't want it either, so as it is what we have, i assume you don't have a problem with it. What you didn't want was economic classes, the only thing you specified. Nice try though, wormtongue
think you might need to call the girl to your aid here, you're clearly not up for the task at hand
You've clearly struggled in this debate with me, but do pretend that you didn't.