Message from @Spydig

Discord ID: 591324742506774556


2019-06-20 17:50:07 UTC  

Not authority to e.g., perform miracles

2019-06-20 17:50:18 UTC  

So the Holy Spirit can create miracles thru any denomination, be it catholic or protestant?

2019-06-20 17:50:30 UTC  

Yeah, whenever He wants to, that's up to Him

2019-06-20 17:50:33 UTC  

Right so have there ever been any successors that have deviated from the Church's teaching?

2019-06-20 17:50:42 UTC  

Through a Muslim is He really wanted to

2019-06-20 17:50:46 UTC  

Yes @Oboe

2019-06-20 17:50:48 UTC  

current ~~pope~~

2019-06-20 17:50:49 UTC  

Example

2019-06-20 17:50:52 UTC  

Arius

2019-06-20 17:50:56 UTC  

Yes, many

2019-06-20 17:51:13 UTC  

Men are fallible

2019-06-20 17:51:29 UTC  

Men are fallible but the Holy Spirit is not

2019-06-20 17:51:39 UTC  

And these people having the lineage to the apostles should be justified through their authority to define doctrine?

2019-06-20 17:51:57 UTC  

They can define doctrine in a very limited sense.

2019-06-20 17:52:03 UTC  

*very* limited

2019-06-20 17:52:21 UTC  

But if they used that authority to contradict scripture is nullified?

2019-06-20 17:52:25 UTC  

Can anyone define doctrine who isnt of the historical lineage?

2019-06-20 17:52:54 UTC  

Not really, like they can, but it wouldn't be as reliable

2019-06-20 17:53:09 UTC  

Of course we have layman biblical scholars and everything

2019-06-20 17:53:11 UTC  

They can’t contradict any of three things. A. Sacred Scripture B. Sacred Tradition C. Sacred Magisterium

2019-06-20 17:53:24 UTC  

But that's not the same as the teaching authority of the Church defining a doctrine

2019-06-20 17:54:40 UTC  

Now, I know this may be a bit difficult but do you have any sources that proves absolutely that either an apostle or a disciple of an apostle believed in doctrine such as infant baptism, the veneration of saints, or a literal interpretation of the bread and blood?

2019-06-20 17:55:10 UTC  

Not necessary

2019-06-20 17:55:41 UTC  

Is that a no?

2019-06-20 17:55:48 UTC  

Did I say no?

2019-06-20 17:55:55 UTC  

You didn't give a direct answer

2019-06-20 17:56:06 UTC  

I was asking if you had it

2019-06-20 17:56:50 UTC  

brb

2019-06-20 17:57:10 UTC  

back

2019-06-20 17:57:13 UTC  

My answer is that it’s not relevant. I can provide sources that the college of bishops, as the direct successors to the apostles, have defined dogmatically the real presence of the Eucharist. And have authorized and recommended both infant baptism and veneration of saints

2019-06-20 17:57:40 UTC  

My issue is whether we confirm that these traditions are truly apostolic

2019-06-20 17:57:56 UTC  

I answer yes

2019-06-20 17:58:06 UTC  

And what source would you cite?

2019-06-20 17:58:12 UTC  

Veneration of saints wasn’t because *there weren’t any at the time*

2019-06-20 17:58:24 UTC  

Irenaeus knew John the Apostle and also met I think James the Greater

2019-06-20 17:58:33 UTC  

Oh btw

2019-06-20 17:58:36 UTC  

Regardless of view

2019-06-20 17:58:53 UTC  

I think we can appreciate this

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/587029563863990282/591326121715302426/image0.jpg

2019-06-20 17:59:31 UTC  

inb4 “muh female minister of communion”

2019-06-20 17:59:54 UTC  

muh female minister of communion