Obamas gloves

@旭峰🇨🇳#3262 Mary enjoyed being pounded by 8 inch aftican cock

@旭峰🇨🇳#3262

they called her "virgin" ironically

Bad b8

The brainlets evolved

Try harder next time

<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question ✝

**-** What is your biblical interpretation of Genesis? Was it literal or metaphorical/symbolic? Are portions literal/symbolic?

It was written by man who was show things beyond his comprehension, same with revelation. How could we expect Early Biblical man, without the scientific aptitude, to understand and write down what he saw accurately?

Literal ,mean if I were god I’d definetly drop some super cryptic shit down on the humans just to see the fireworks

I think of who translated the bible and the time it was written in as important factors when considering the bible. In the case of Genesis, it is far more likely to be symbolic than literal. The 7 days would most likely be an incorrect assumption on our part, we are trying to define the processes of the Devine using our own words.

What does a day mean to an eternal being?

Well mean god himself supposedly invented the concept so in that case it’s prolly literal

Biblical Literalism

Biblical literalism is a fucking joke

genesis contradicts everything we have observed

Christians who believe in young earth creationism are mongoloids

*cough* @Shalopy

@Riley out of curiosity why do you trust scientists more than priests (not saying I don't do the same thing)?

Cuz it’s science my dude

@The Desert Fox V because scientists have evidence supporting their claims

priests have "faith"

@Riley but why do you believe them?

Why do you believe evidence presented is true?

@The Desert Fox V because its been peer reviewed

idk what you want me to say

nor do i know what you are trying to tell me

"well what if there is some grand conspiracy consisting of every scientist from the past 200 years to destroy god!"

I'm not saying that's the case nor do I believe that. I've just been thinking recently that for the vast majority of people, the basis of some science is basically the same as the basis for religion

no, that is absolutely not correct

not in the slightest

in science we start with data, then formulate theories which best fit the data

we start with what we know, then come to conclusions

in religion you start with your conclusions

and you when pressed for evidence you give some stupid apologetic or say "well you just gotta have faith"

because of this, religion is not scientific. It makes claims about reality that are not determined scientifically

How many times have we gone over this bruh

Piss pee pee poo

Shitting on the floor

Shitting the floor