Message from @Gromp
Discord ID: 642434797725286430
Is anyone going to defend that slut, Mary?
Yes.
Actually our ancestors probably fucked her
Jesus is related to me
IDF Girls 😍
IDF Girls 😍
Obamas gloves
@旭峰🇨🇳#3262 Mary enjoyed being pounded by 8 inch aftican cock
@旭峰🇨🇳#3262
they called her "virgin" ironically
Bad b8
The brainlets evolved
Try harder next time
<@&588707615643795456> Daily Question ✝
**-** What is your biblical interpretation of Genesis? Was it literal or metaphorical/symbolic? Are portions literal/symbolic?
It was written by man who was show things beyond his comprehension, same with revelation. How could we expect Early Biblical man, without the scientific aptitude, to understand and write down what he saw accurately?
Literal ,mean if I were god I’d definetly drop some super cryptic shit down on the humans just to see the fireworks
I think of who translated the bible and the time it was written in as important factors when considering the bible. In the case of Genesis, it is far more likely to be symbolic than literal. The 7 days would most likely be an incorrect assumption on our part, we are trying to define the processes of the Devine using our own words.
What does a day mean to an eternal being?
Biblical Literalism
Biblical literalism is a fucking joke
genesis contradicts everything we have observed
Christians who believe in young earth creationism are mongoloids
@Riley out of curiosity why do you trust scientists more than priests (not saying I don't do the same thing)?
Cuz it’s science my dude
@The Desert Fox V because scientists have evidence supporting their claims
priests have "faith"
@Riley but why do you believe them?
Why do you believe evidence presented is true?
@The Desert Fox V because its been peer reviewed
idk what you want me to say
nor do i know what you are trying to tell me
"well what if there is some grand conspiracy consisting of every scientist from the past 200 years to destroy god!"
I'm not saying that's the case nor do I believe that. I've just been thinking recently that for the vast majority of people, the basis of some science is basically the same as the basis for religion
no, that is absolutely not correct
not in the slightest
in science we start with data, then formulate theories which best fit the data
we start with what we know, then come to conclusions