From Hinduism to Shinto.

God is not lacking anything when he desires, that's like claiming us not being pure act means God isn't pure act

What matters is the fact that a perfect being possessing a desire, which entails a potential to be out of accord with the desire, isn’t actually perfect

I already summarised it.

God isn't the subject

^

You have to address this

God has no desire for himself or anything about him

Address what?

thats irrelevant

@Veraic

Rather God's desire is in union with himself

it doesnt matter who you say the desire is for.

It does buddy

Yeah if god is out of accord with his desires, which he is in light of a single bad existing (-> Omni benevolence) then god isn’t fully actualized

And imperfect as well

its not, because your argument is that if he has desires then hes not perfect.
Gods only desire is that you follow natural law and worship him

You act as if time doesn't exist

Such low rigor in your argument

@Eoppa if something is complete, can you complete it?

time is cyclical

I’m not sure how you actually addressed the entailment eoppa. You’re just psueding out instead of showing how a potential to be out of accord with what’s desired rules out the property of being purely actual

1) God brings things to fruition across time 2) Free will is necessary to his desires

God obviously as of right now isn’t observing a world that’s in accord with its desire

He's not out of discord with his own desire

We are

That's such a bad argument

God desires us to be in accord with its desires or not?

Yes he does

badd dodge

Ok

So god isnt actually existing in its best possible state because the world isn’t existing at it desires

Because we aren’t in accord with its desires

False

Which is its desires

the Lord does not change

The correct phrasing is God desires us to freely follow him

the material world can change, but that does not change the Lord

Ok so go also desires us to freely not follow him?

You’re going down the same path as the first one

lol