censorship isnt bad

equality isnt good idk why youd strive for it

i dont even disagree im just not sure how youd conclude that equality is a good thing from that

i know ltv lol

i dont see how ltv makes any case for equality

its just an account for phenomenon in capitalism

i never said anything about absolute equality im just trying to understand why equality is desirable

you just said equality is good because society is unequal

thats not answering the question

the question was why is equality desirable

yeah thats just begging the question, dude

your saying equality is good because its good, you use a negative example(inequality)but thats really what it says

i never mentioned absolute equality

i think music today is good

thats your opinion

i dont care what other people think. i think things are only valuable in light of some subjectively held criteria so this means nothing to me

im just waiting for a reason to think equality is good

yeah, youre injecting absolute equality into my questioning when its not relevant at all

yeah thats fine

i think everybody should have to struggle and fight for a right to their life

im 28

i mean, your reason for equality being good is incoherent so im not shocked that this is what youd focus on

so equality is good because you want it?

thats a serious question, not a gotcha

i mean any kind of equality

why would i want to artificially lift/lower unequals to my status

i dont care or know anything about race

its not germane

what does race have to do with what i asked

it doesnt matter what you plug in instead of race, why should i want it to be equalized

no i didnt

i asked why equality is good

yeah the question was why is it good

i never said anything about my view

oh i didnt see your question sorry

i dont see how my position regarding race is relevant to the question of equality being good or not

maybe you could connect those dots for me

yeah but it being the case that races are or are not equal doesnt speak to equality being good or not

good at all

me not liking that doesnt make it wrong

same for the inverse

yes

equality is a difference of attributes/properties

who said equality doesnt exist

i must have missed that

im not sure, i certainly cant see any reason to be obliged to believe that they are existent independently ofnus

@ACentralScrutinizer could we go to another text channel please

hes not nazbol lol

discord fascists gay prove me right

they are all homos

praise krishna get into bar fights

cure for depression and nihilism

yeah become a slave to a kike who preached effeminate "virtue"

sounds like a good idea

islam is better than christianity still shit though

yes there is

one promotes homosexuality the other promotes killing your enemies

intellect is useless

you gonna will bullets out of the air with your mind?

anarcho capitalism is an oxymoron

property norms cannot exist without a state

?

capitalist theorists were pretty clear that without property norms you dont have capitalism

so basically you have no argument against the position

otherwise youd just give it instead of dodging

tell me how you impose property norms without a state

well ive asked you for an argument that supports a particular claim, right

your just saying "no"

it doesnt matter why

i said explicitly the reason doesnt matter

if your not giving an argument there is no argument

also its interesting that your willing to argue about you being unwilling to argue but are unwilling to argue for an actual position

you could have rendered the argument by now surely

but hey im the idiot, right

how have you identified malign intentions? my position is that capitalism necessitates property norms -> property norms only exist with a state -> anarcho capitalism is stateless

you can say the premises are wrong but idk how you conclude its dishonesty

if you want to reject a premise your gonna have to give an argument though

so you wont give an argument because i dont know the argument?

thats interesting

if you dont want to defend your incoherent position thats fine

i cant force you to

i said you didnt have an argument which is just true, right

if no argument is given the interlocutor doesnt have an argument in the discourse

but hey, whatever excuse you need to believe your not incapable of defending the position

what additional meaning was it

why does it matter what people at the time thought about hitler lol

completely irrelevant

hitler is never going to be viewed in a positive light by the average joe

no

fascism isnt even ethnonationalist in character

ironically it is third position on nationalism

national identity is partially inhereited partially voluntary to fascism

i dont know what that is

no

theres a lot of debate in academia as to what actually constitutes a nation

the only consensus is that its a pre political community

i dont know what you mean

is this the argument through etymology?

because the study of nationalism isnt concerned with what the root of the word is