^^

yes thats what i meant

Because to have desires entails that there’s potential to be out of accord with that desire(which god is)

To have potential or to be actually out of accord with desires means to be imperfect

The desire isn't regarding himself

We've been over this

No, God is not unable to achieve, he chooses not to allow himself to achieve to safeguard free-will.

@Romanov so god desires us to not follow his desires

its not about Lord himself

No.

its purly about us

@Blueroad

So god does desire us to follow his desires?

Wdym?

God desires us to follow his desires, and following necessitates free will

@Blueroad I am curious, what are your religious adherences?

On gods view it would be a better world if we did everything it says we should?

God desires us to follow his desire to follow his law.

No ad hominem, just curious.

Hindu

the Lord does not have material desires only spiritual

So you believe in the circle of Samsara, then.

^ yes

Material vs immaterial desires isn’t relevant

im not Hindu though, i follow the pure vedic traditions not the Dravidian shit that came after

I know, I know.

I studied the East Asian religions.

From Hinduism to Shinto.

God is not lacking anything when he desires, that's like claiming us not being pure act means God isn't pure act

What matters is the fact that a perfect being possessing a desire, which entails a potential to be out of accord with the desire, isn’t actually perfect

I already summarised it.

God isn't the subject

^

You have to address this

God has no desire for himself or anything about him

Address what?

thats irrelevant

@Veraic

Rather God's desire is in union with himself

it doesnt matter who you say the desire is for.

It does buddy