Message from @Enkrum
Discord ID: 654725664188006411
at some point, we didnt have free will, so he was out of accord with that desire and had the potential to be in accord with it
he desired us to have free will
and he is not out of accordance with that at any time ever in the history of humanity
lol
we have always had free will ffs
Kant made an argument on that in his novel.
lol
okay
EOC im gaining nothing from this debate
talk to me after you have a good think about what the actual argument is
Why, because no one follows your nonsensical contrarianism?
Which is effectively composed of strawman arguments?
lol
strawmen arguments
right
As far as I recall, you’ve just been a sperg this whole time, while casting the blame on others.
so thats two incoherent example in which you fail to demonstrate a supposed lack of accordance
but they were basically just 2 ways of saying the same thing
so its more like 1 incoherent example
like what you guys have been responding to me this entire time @Enkrum
lmao
i think this debate is concluded
theists won obviously
we need some kind of scoreboard actually
lmao
People have provided a slurry of explanations, each varying in content, but essentially carrying the same message. So I would say their theological perspectives are fairly well-founded.
"theist won"
scores broken down by race religion and country?
individual scoreboard?
maksim would always win doe lol
Beyond the “complexity” of your argument, it literally boils down to “iF bAd ThInG hApPeN, wHy DoEs GoD eXiSt.”
its a modified form of it tbh
made to be extra annoying
and you just stating it as if its a sperg isnt actually an argument
@Spergerger You can certainly see similarities.
lmao
its a distinction without a difference
@Spergerger ‘ey what do you think of the nondenominational Christians, anyway.
@Spergerger god intended for humans to have free will?
idk if i fit into a denomination but i lean towards Catholicism and sedevacantist position
as far as my opinion goes i think that christians should present a united front against opposition but that doesnt mean that we have to all fellate each other
So essentially, yes, opposed theological concepts, but a unified force when stood against.
That’s fine.
On the condition that the other denominations don’t start attacking one another.
yeh ofc