Recession will be world wide.

The uk can go eat shit

U wot m8

the eu can go eat shit

this debate is going to be epic

I mostly hate their accent

>seething_britbong.png

Economic Fallout won't happen

And even if it did, it would be preferable to being in the EU

greed

of course

because the market is crowded with jews

@Deleted User

Brexit is based and Norfpilled

Leaf means leaf

Simpl as

The EU is only good for certain countries

The fact they press their leftist rules onto the countries is disgusting

The EU is only meant to be an economical Union, not be a shit storm of a parliament which allows numerous amounts of unskilled immigrants coming in from places where they don’t respect our culture or rules

The EU can eat Britain’s shit

Good for the Brit’s for leaving the shitstorm of a “union”

sovreignty>economy

pro brexit for sure

not gonna happen

brexit has been promised to happen for what, 3 years now? And nothing has happened regardless of how many votes are cast this is I think the 4th vote on brexit, and still nothing is being done

just talk

more talk

and no acton, if Boris really was hell bent on leaving he would do it in a fortnight, send papers to the EU to fuck themselves and be done with it

no deal it is. Meanwhile this beating aroudn the bush will produce 1 of 2 results.

The more probable one is that britain stays in the EU under even greater EU influence while the people continue to peacefully protest as if they can change anything by barking up at the govormental tree.

Or the less probable that they will leave the EU but will suffer economically and as a result they will make the situation so bad that in a year or two people will be begging to rejoin the EU.

@Bogatyr Bogumir Boris has said leave or die by October 31st

Nietzsche has done as much as anyone in undermining the Traditional spiritual roots of Western man in his division of religion into life-denying as exemplified in Christianity and life-affirming as exemplified in Paganism. The destruction of Christianity has not led to a life-affirming paganism, but rather to a paganism that limits itself to the satisfaction of biological needs. As was shown in a previous post, there was much less difference between the Christian and the Pagan elites (whatever the masses may have believed). The dichotomy proposed by Nietzsche is useless; the spirituality of the elite has always been life-transcending.

It is likely that Nietzsche borrowed this concept from his “educator” Arthur Schopenhauer. Schopenhauer took the opposite position from Nietzsche; within the context of his philosophical pessimism, Schopenhauer praised the life-denying religions at the expense of the life-affirming. Among the former, he included the religion of the Upanishads, Buddhism, and Christian mysticism, particularly in its Neoplatonic form. Clearly, this not only ties Christianity to the Eastern religions, but also to the most advanced manifestations of Classical Greek and Roman paganism. I believe that in this matter, Schopenhauer is a better psychologist than Nietzsche.

Furthermore, Schopenhauer criticizes Judaism as a life-affirming religion. This is hard to deny, since Judaism does not have all those other-worldly elements that Nietzsche attributes to Christianity. It is also more interested in material benefits than is Christianity. So all the anti-Semites who lean on Nietzsche for their anti-Christian attitudes are inadvertently promoting Judaism, and are totally missing the continuity between the Classical Pagan civilization and the Christian Middle Ages.

not to be picky or crass, but could you please define life affirming and life denying as I dont really quite follow.

But I think I seewhat you mena but I dont want to misinterpret what you wrote @@Alric the Bretwalda

@Alric the Bretwalda good

your god is a fucking delusion

fuck God

worshipping the material isn't any better

actually its worse.

good thing i worship nothing

hMm