A strawman is debating a caricature of the point you are arguing

Instead of the point

A strawman is a point you fabricate to attack instead of attacking the argument. Taking a whole paragraph of points which doesn't have a single definition and going "But that's not what the definition is" is fabricating a point

Yes

Said better

Agree

@Deleted User are you ready to clarify

how about you tell me

what a "healthy society" is

Are we really doing this?

Do you really not know what healthy means?

Do you really not know what natural is?

What the argument about?

Some people are trying to define „degeneracy“

I see

That would be easy if everyone was Aristotelian, as we could appeal to final causes of man, but obviously we can't right now

So using some gay nihilistic secular worldview there is no degeneracy, go free pedophiles

Ok so we played this game for hours

@Deleted User its vague

@Eoppa nobody thinks that. You are just being a dumbass

we have morals which are derived from our biology

Partially

It's also partly social

@Riley so then degeneracy can be tied to nature?

You are so incredibly inconsistent

gimmi like 45 minutes

im at work

Okie

and btw people do think that

Many famous french postmodernists were pedos

I have no idea why you think that is relevant

@Eoppa im not being inconsistent

Earlier all I did was ask for people to define degeneracy

someoen said "its when u go against nature"

and I claimed that what they said was
a) extremely vague
b) fallacious (appealing to nature)

now that is not what I am doing

I am stating that human morals came about through natural processes

Human morals are essentially evolved instincts

literally google degeneracy and look at the definitions

it's synonymous to sin, evil, perversion, and moral decay

you guys have been trying to define this for over 12 hours lol