Yeah, I like that

But, so many times i see people exploit every free day they can get

fuck off commie bastard

you can't say they haven't done anything good

Unions gave everyone more rights

But they've gone a little far

Labor Unions used to be a vital and essential tool for the progression of worker's rights and good pay - unfourtnely Labor Unions are now as corrupt as the Corporations they were formed to oppose.

Unions are too easily infiltrated, ESOP are where its at for the employees and owners

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

What WinCo does

the employee's are also the owners. Gets skin in the game

Gives employees company stock

state run labor union with a workers council that lets both proletarian and bourgeois reach agreements on conditions and pay and allows that workers only be fired for genuine reasons

Other Companies such as In-N-Out and Chick-fil-A are also great example of owners treating employees very *very* well

Ford Motor Company under the founder Henry Ford as well

Even Janitor's and Part-Time employees receive 401k plans, paid sick and vacation leave, dental and medical insurance

Better treated employees are more productive

And will stay with the company for longer

The problem with Unions is that the owners and workers interests are at odds. ESOP solves that problem

The two become one

Sure

I think Labor Unions would be better if it was 100% democratic

i.e no "owner"

Each decision is voted on by all members

Anyways ive gtg

As far as I’m concerned labor unions are a useful balance to the company in order to prevent abuse by employers if it occurs.

I strongly prefer unions with a council and charter over a single leader union however.

That makes sure the *unions* are kept in check by the employees.

this was a pretty great system imo
its a shame that the war prevented completion of many projects
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Labour_Front

@Deleted User They only existed because they unironically killed all the other unions.

yeh and they did a better job @DrRisen

@Deleted User better for some, worse for others.

worse for the jew and the businessmen better for the german worker

@Deleted User Don’t play dumb, you know what I was saying.

no i really dont @DrRisen

Better for some workers, worse for others. I’m sure the white German fascist was very well represented by the union. I don’t think the same can be said for a socialist, or a Jew, or a Slavic, or a black.

@Deleted User

i see no issue with precluding socialists and foreigners from business
as far as i can tell most slavs within germany were considered aryan so idk what youre talking about in regards to them and as for blacks, im sure all 5 of them were very unhappy

@Deleted User That doesn’t deny the fact that it was better for some and worse for others. You thinking that is a good thing is irrelevant, because it *is* a thing.

ok
so what issue did you take with me describing it as ''worse for the jew and the businessmen better for the german worker''