Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 625067499402035202


2019-09-21 20:21:58 UTC  

deadass

2019-09-21 20:25:52 UTC  
2019-09-21 20:26:05 UTC  

limited pollution

2019-09-21 20:26:07 UTC  

powerful

2019-09-21 20:26:09 UTC  

sustainable

2019-09-21 20:26:25 UTC  

So its good for the planet?

2019-09-21 20:26:40 UTC  

Better than burning stuff yes

2019-09-21 20:26:52 UTC  

there is of course nuclear waste but that is rather easy to deal with

2019-09-21 20:27:10 UTC  

and the possibility of a leak is not really an issue for a developed country like the US

2019-09-21 20:30:17 UTC  

it is very good for the planet in comparison to solar, wind, coal, gas and all the other wrong solutions

2019-09-21 20:32:08 UTC  

Nuclear energy?

2019-09-21 20:33:02 UTC  

That's bs

2019-09-21 20:33:17 UTC  

Nuclear, geothermal, and hydroelectric are the most effective. Nuclear overall is the best as far as energy output but where nuclear power isn't viable you would build either geothermal or hydroelectric, depending on the environment

2019-09-21 20:33:19 UTC  

Wind and fusion are superior sources of energy

2019-09-21 20:33:21 UTC  

@Smönsk how so?

2019-09-21 20:34:01 UTC  

Nuclear power plants are dangerous too. One tiny mistake and everyone dies yesyesyes

2019-09-21 20:34:13 UTC  

Solar, wind, and fusion

2019-09-21 20:34:16 UTC  

Superior

2019-09-21 20:34:19 UTC  

Wind isn't viable because of the amount of pollution that's generated in their erection vs how much energy is produced

2019-09-21 20:34:52 UTC  

Fission has come a long way since it's been created, it's not nearly as dangerous anymore

2019-09-21 20:35:05 UTC  

In their erection?

2019-09-21 20:35:27 UTC  

Oh yeah it's fission isn't it

2019-09-21 20:35:33 UTC  

Their creation @Deleted User

2019-09-21 20:36:13 UTC  

How? They're _nuclear_ power plants

2019-09-21 20:36:44 UTC  

Any individual fault can turn a city into a a radioactive piece of crap

2019-09-21 20:37:46 UTC  

What is this

2019-09-21 20:38:15 UTC  

Pdf about the types of nuclear reactors

2019-09-21 20:38:30 UTC  

OK

2019-09-21 20:39:18 UTC  

I can't open it

2019-09-21 20:47:16 UTC  

Oil is best

2019-09-21 20:47:24 UTC  

I want my nigger money

2019-09-21 20:48:31 UTC  

Short term is going to be oil. It’s one of the most versatile fuels out there. It does have some consequences in the long term, but we aren’t talking long term are we?

Long term is definitely nuclear, hands down.

2019-09-21 20:49:24 UTC  

Long term it's slavery <:ancap:454025572251861003>

2019-09-21 20:54:52 UTC  

@Deleted User Nah, human body is retardedly energy inefficient compared to nuclear,

2019-09-21 20:55:20 UTC  

When the humans die of work you can just burn them for fuel

2019-09-21 20:55:37 UTC  

Epic reusable energy <:ancap:454025572251861003>

2019-09-21 20:58:15 UTC  

Nuclear (fission or fusion) and solar

2019-09-21 20:58:39 UTC  

Hydrogen fuel cell for cars

2019-09-21 20:59:07 UTC  

Also, I’m just gonna create my own new mid-tier and elect hydroelectric power. That shit is reliable as hell and *dam* powerful too.

2019-09-21 21:00:10 UTC  

Pun aggressively intended.