That conflicts with the statement you later said.

They propagandize people to live in hedonistic pleasure

ya, because of ageless undying corporate entities. remove corporate personhood and make individuals responsible again

You could still do things as a collective if you choose but a person would be responsible

How would you make them responsible if they have neither morals nor a superior regulatory organization.

Natural Law

Corporations control social morals

That would just result in them pursuing self-interest, meaning pooling of more resources in almost exclusively their favor. That breaks the ability to hamper the control of corporations.

Like today, it's very clear that our leaders no longer represent the best interests of the people they serve.

That’s because of capitalism

that's because of rampant regulation.

it has nothing to do with capitalism

What rampant regulation.

capitalism is the natural state

Yes because politicians are owned by corporations to push what they want because of regulations

humans trading labor for value

Okay

Corporations are continuously attempting to lobby to Congress and attempt to pass themselves off as personal entities.

there is literally no other way

That’s counterintuitive to regulation.

No?

Corporatism and socialism

Agreed with corporatism.

besides Luxury gay space Communism....which is a fantasy.. this is not star trek

I agree more with corporatism but not socialism

Corporatism is an interesting mixed economic model.

Corporatism is epic

And so natsyndie

I haven’t studied that one enough.

Capitalism is a replication of natural biology. Organisms trade effort/work for resources/value.
The ONLY way to form a society without labor/value exchange is if you remove the biological element. Therefore Socialism and Communism advocate for the destruction of not only individuality but natural biological function as a whole.
The only way for Communism to work is to remove the human element.

**mic drop**

That's absolutely fine. Capitalism is basically the method to sustain the upkeep of the state; a planned economy is needed while you're establishing the state because you need to allocate raw materials/sectors that will ultimately allow you to prop up the consumer economy at a later time.

But to recklessly pursue unregulated capitalism is dangerous in that you would allow predatory corporations to destroy that competition, and in turn hamper innovation.

Even in Star Trek they realized that it was retarded to just fly around not paying for anything, that's why they invented "platinum bars" as a medium of exchange.

Well if there is a predator nature will find a way around it. either by killing the beast or evolving to not be threatened

"Nature finds a way"

So you need some form of regulation, which we are currently lacking because of evident tax loopholes for corporations and PAC lobbying.

oh ye of little faith

How will you kill the megacorporation.

What is a porcupine?

Say, you're a layman.

a layman can fire a cannon and gun