democracy is a sham because whoever controls the media controls the voters

Freedom of Association, a very basic Libertarian tenet

If you dont like your family or your church you can go make a new one... with blackjack, and hookers

If good people were in the media then it would just be good people controlling the people

@TԋҽDυԃҽAႦιԃҽʂ how is bing conditioned to act a certain and controlled by corporations freedom

might as well just have them control them directly

Freedom of Association and the Non-Aggression Principal are the foundation of Liberty

Freedom can only truly exist with righteousness

Ahhh, I do love me some private courts.

You keep talking about corporations like they are people, they arent,

we give corps too much power today, that's true.

in a more free state they would not have as much power

Not really they have the ability to control what you say in the new public square

You just stated support of the NAP, which is a principal tenet of minarchism/anarcho-capitalism. Either believer of those ideologies would disagree that corporations have too much power; in fact he would encourage more capabilities of them.

That conflicts with the statement you later said.

They propagandize people to live in hedonistic pleasure

ya, because of ageless undying corporate entities. remove corporate personhood and make individuals responsible again

You could still do things as a collective if you choose but a person would be responsible

How would you make them responsible if they have neither morals nor a superior regulatory organization.

Natural Law

Corporations control social morals

That would just result in them pursuing self-interest, meaning pooling of more resources in almost exclusively their favor. That breaks the ability to hamper the control of corporations.

Like today, it's very clear that our leaders no longer represent the best interests of the people they serve.

That’s because of capitalism

that's because of rampant regulation.

it has nothing to do with capitalism

What rampant regulation.

capitalism is the natural state

Yes because politicians are owned by corporations to push what they want because of regulations

humans trading labor for value

Okay

Corporations are continuously attempting to lobby to Congress and attempt to pass themselves off as personal entities.

there is literally no other way

That’s counterintuitive to regulation.

No?

Corporatism and socialism

Agreed with corporatism.

besides Luxury gay space Communism....which is a fantasy.. this is not star trek

I agree more with corporatism but not socialism

Corporatism is an interesting mixed economic model.

Corporatism is epic