Message from @CaesarKonrad
Discord ID: 654479111590248458
people acting as a group is not the problem. it's only natural actually.
hamilton was a monarchist faggot
he wanted mega banks and washington to be a king for life
founding fathers were liberals end of story
Except Washington is typically classified as a federalist.
A family is a group,
do you think we should break up families and dictate to them how they should behave?
You’re promoting individualistic expression, rather than communitarian.
exactly like a socialist
That’s counterintuitive to a family function.
OH BRAVE NEW WORLD! that has such people in it!
I'm promoting natural law
They only know what’s best in so far they are free of corporate control
nature has both collectives and hermits
which both serve a purpose
Freedom to be controlled!
democracy is a sham because whoever controls the media controls the voters
Freedom of Association, a very basic Libertarian tenet
If you dont like your family or your church you can go make a new one... with blackjack, and hookers
If good people were in the media then it would just be good people controlling the people
might as well just have them control them directly
Freedom of Association and the Non-Aggression Principal are the foundation of Liberty
Freedom can only truly exist with righteousness
Ahhh, I do love me some private courts.
You keep talking about corporations like they are people, they arent,
we give corps too much power today, that's true.
in a more free state they would not have as much power
Not really they have the ability to control what you say in the new public square
You just stated support of the NAP, which is a principal tenet of minarchism/anarcho-capitalism. Either believer of those ideologies would disagree that corporations have too much power; in fact he would encourage more capabilities of them.
That conflicts with the statement you later said.
They propagandize people to live in hedonistic pleasure
ya, because of ageless undying corporate entities. remove corporate personhood and make individuals responsible again
You could still do things as a collective if you choose but a person would be responsible
How would you make them responsible if they have neither morals nor a superior regulatory organization.
Natural Law
Corporations control social morals
That would just result in them pursuing self-interest, meaning pooling of more resources in almost exclusively their favor. That breaks the ability to hamper the control of corporations.
Like today, it's very clear that our leaders no longer represent the best interests of the people they serve.
That’s because of capitalism
that's because of rampant regulation.