Another thing that we have learned from military experiments is; when forces are lead by a committee, they are actually more likely to overreact, and they do not take responsibility. When, in the best case, the committee agrees on what action should be taken, they tended to snowball the situation and others to bandwagon on the ideas. And since there is no one man in charge, the blame can always be shrugged off and responsibility cannot be taken. This is in stark contrast to military research including a single person as leader, who can asses the situation and reason within himself to reach a mature and a more successful decision, and if it fails, he is the sole person to blame. Also, it is quite simply the way humans have evolved, we didn't use to have committees, just a tribal leader.
This is why i think a one-party dictatorship is superior.
