@Sven Brender
The best example, in my opinion, of dictatorship against democracy is Rome, as they did not have foreign nations that could challenge their power, as practically all dictatorships after did. They went from a period of constant infighting for power to centuries of peace and stability, until it would eventually succumb to the burden of immigration and the foreign, desert, non-European religion; Christianity.
In Democracy, there is constantly a fight for power which divides the nation, even if it is a one-party Democracy. A fight for power allows powerful outsiders to aid politicians in pursuit for power in return for political favor, which is exactly what is happening today, and is exactly why we are in the situation we are in. The voters, even if they are just men, are also easily persuaded by their sources of information like media, as that is all they know. This is again something which can be easily employed by powerful outsiders to form a narrative and subvert the people, and not something which can decisively be suppressed as power is divided.
Dictatorships, on the other hand, has one person who is in total control of the nation which is united under him, so that the resources of that nation can be put to the best use. He can take a mature and calm approach to all issues as he does not have to fight for power to make decisions. On the same note he can create stability in the nation, by suppressing subverters or people who seek power, and he can employ the full force of the nation as it is, of course, united and not divided.
