I will be like my ancestors and build courtyards

@DrRisen Then there is only one option which cannot be blocked

suspension of civil authority and the imposition of military authority

Constition allows it "or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

Honestly

the Democrats don't follow the constitution the way it was meant to be followed

with the

"Living document" bullshit

Fuck the constitution

^

Which violates the constitution and would quickly and brutally be put down by the military authority rejecting its master. We have a military force of patriotic volunteers of which a confident 8/10 are paranoid about government tyranny.

Magical unicorns are a hell of a drug Mak.

Wrong

It is 100% in line with the constitution

Prove me wrong

No, no it isn’t. Suspending civil liberties is a right of congress, not of the executive branch.

Wrong

" unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it"

Which as we already discussed was neutered by the Posse Comitatus act.

The military would side with trump and the constitution

no its not

u fucking moron

Rude.

Fuck you

Im Right.

Oh, by the way, only congress has the authority to suspend habeus corpus, which double-neuters the martial law plan.

Wrong again

You fucking idiot

Become

tedpilled

The system can't be reformed @DrRisen

@DrRisen Read Industrial Society and Its Future

The President can suspend Habeus Corpus in times of civil conflict or invasion of public saftey

@Maksim Only with the approval of congress. If congress rejects the proposal it goes to the judicial branch. The judicial branch who’s members exclusively are approved by Congress.

@DrRisen Wrong

President can suspend habeus corpus without congressional approval - the SC can however intervene

anyways im done

Wait, oh my god hold on, which article are you quoting? @Maksim

Chernoybl is such a good fucking show

It is

didnt it trigger a bunch of leftys by mentioning the holodomor?