They can’t do crap in a law enforcing capacity.

Just have the supreme court approve it

its 5-4 anyways

Fucking petty "democracy"

Getting in the way of action

But then it’s not an executive order. It would be going through the judicial branch.

Which defeats the point of avoiding the courts.

Idiot

Rude

Executive Order --> some moron judge blocks it --> supreme court approves it

It’s not as simple as that. It never is. The number of circuits and appeals it needs to go through to reach the Supreme Court is massive, and even then someone can open a separate lawsuit with a favorable judge and freeze it all over again,

Just

become tedpilled

every one of you

let's form a homestead in the woods

I will be like my ancestors and build courtyards

@DrRisen Then there is only one option which cannot be blocked

suspension of civil authority and the imposition of military authority

Constition allows it "or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

Honestly

the Democrats don't follow the constitution the way it was meant to be followed

with the

"Living document" bullshit

Fuck the constitution

^

Which violates the constitution and would quickly and brutally be put down by the military authority rejecting its master. We have a military force of patriotic volunteers of which a confident 8/10 are paranoid about government tyranny.

Magical unicorns are a hell of a drug Mak.

Wrong

It is 100% in line with the constitution

Prove me wrong

No, no it isn’t. Suspending civil liberties is a right of congress, not of the executive branch.

Wrong

" unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it"

Which as we already discussed was neutered by the Posse Comitatus act.

The military would side with trump and the constitution

no its not

u fucking moron

Rude.

Fuck you

Im Right.

Oh, by the way, only congress has the authority to suspend habeus corpus, which double-neuters the martial law plan.