Message from @Orson Krennic
Discord ID: 640291619668623378
Aljazeera is notorious for being the chief source of communists to describe capitalist "atrocities"
this seems like BS lemme look it up
That's some retarded economic research. Churchill was a retarded leader yes, but her figures are exacerbated especially since she has no real data to examine
Also it's not a bad thing to get resources to market
That's a retarded nationalist viewpoint
The British did the dialectically logical thing to do
Seeing as you are a free marketer capitalist
I can understand why you think exploitation is justifiable
But that doesn't make you any less of cuck
And a lot of the money earned from their profits were reinvested into economic infrastructure which the Indians use today
The British weren't pouring that money into the crowns treasury lmao
"I mean yeah they didnt pay for goods with their own money and instead used Indian tax money but the company made railroads which they continued to use to exploit the colony so its ok"
That's a moral argument
Morals are subjective
Colonization cannot be objectively immoral
Sorry bucko
But economic data is measurable, and the world economy benefitted as a result of the goods going to market
So if I had you pay taxes for the money you earned from working to manufacture or cultivate goods that I buy with your tax dollars and sell for my profit, it would be justified because it makes me more money than just being fair about it?
Fair?
Moral argument again
railroads were originally built for private companies all over the world
this does not proclude benefits from these structures which are still used today
So you believe that exploitation is justified and you would be fine when put subject to it? @Orson Krennic
did they benefit from the exploitation?
Exploitation isn't immoral
So
if the answer is yes then the exploitation is moral
Because nothing is immoral
So you believe exploitation is moral because in the scenario that it benefits you the individual?
if it benefits the nation then it is moral
So if you were cucked from the fruits of your labor, because it benefited the state you would be fine with it?
lol this is your brain on marxism
That doesnt answer my question
''yeh i dont care if you had to invest and organise something you dont deserve and reward''
this is what you think
It's moral because nothing is immoral
Might makes right
There's your justification
But economically
India grew more under Britain than in any time period