Message from @Orson Krennic

Discord ID: 640293301966340101


2019-11-02 20:49:56 UTC  

So if I had you pay taxes for the money you earned from working to manufacture or cultivate goods that I buy with your tax dollars and sell for my profit, it would be justified because it makes me more money than just being fair about it?

2019-11-02 20:50:17 UTC  

Fair?

2019-11-02 20:50:18 UTC  

Lmao

2019-11-02 20:50:20 UTC  

Moral argument again

2019-11-02 20:50:26 UTC  

railroads were originally built for private companies all over the world
this does not proclude benefits from these structures which are still used today

2019-11-02 20:50:51 UTC  

So you believe that exploitation is justified and you would be fine when put subject to it? @Orson Krennic

2019-11-02 20:51:24 UTC  

did they benefit from the exploitation?

2019-11-02 20:51:36 UTC  

Exploitation isn't immoral

2019-11-02 20:51:37 UTC  

So

2019-11-02 20:51:46 UTC  

if the answer is yes then the exploitation is moral

2019-11-02 20:51:48 UTC  

Because nothing is immoral

2019-11-02 20:52:32 UTC  

So you believe exploitation is moral because in the scenario that it benefits you the individual?

2019-11-02 20:53:40 UTC  

if it benefits the nation then it is moral

2019-11-02 20:54:35 UTC  

So if you were cucked from the fruits of your labor, because it benefited the state you would be fine with it?

2019-11-02 20:55:41 UTC  

lol this is your brain on marxism

2019-11-02 20:56:12 UTC  

That doesnt answer my question

2019-11-02 20:56:30 UTC  

''yeh i dont care if you had to invest and organise something you dont deserve and reward''

2019-11-02 20:56:42 UTC  

this is what you think

2019-11-02 20:56:47 UTC  

It's moral because nothing is immoral

2019-11-02 20:56:51 UTC  

Might makes right

2019-11-02 20:56:59 UTC  

There's your justification

2019-11-02 20:57:02 UTC  

But economically

2019-11-02 20:57:12 UTC  

India grew more under Britain than in any time period

2019-11-02 20:57:16 UTC  

Look at their GDP

2019-11-02 20:57:24 UTC  

Who gives you the economic means to buy machinery? @Deleted User

2019-11-02 20:57:31 UTC  

The workers, right?

2019-11-02 20:57:35 UTC  

lmao

2019-11-02 20:58:40 UTC  

what wage does the owner extract for organising the means of production in order to be efficient?

2019-11-02 20:58:48 UTC  

according to you nothing

2019-11-02 20:59:09 UTC  

Because the workers can mutually agree to do that themselves

2019-11-02 20:59:30 UTC  

lmao
indians were gonna build the railroads?

2019-11-02 20:59:42 UTC  

they were gonna do that any day now

2019-11-02 20:59:49 UTC  

gods youre dumb

2019-11-02 21:00:05 UTC  

If the British didnt rob them of trillions then they most likely would have

2019-11-02 21:00:37 UTC  

idk if thats even true
also money does not = tech otherwise mansa musa would have built wakanda lmao

2019-11-02 21:02:15 UTC  

The Indians would've done the exact same with the money

2019-11-02 21:02:20 UTC  

And put it into the world market

2019-11-02 21:02:37 UTC  

And the British had the means to develop the Indian nation better than the Indians could

2019-11-02 21:02:55 UTC  

@Deleted User technology didnt exist so obviously he didnt

2019-11-02 21:03:18 UTC  

lmao this nigga thinks that money = iq

2019-11-02 21:03:20 UTC  

ffs