stealing?

wtf are you talking about lmao

I mean it's better when it's around the global economy than it is just sitting around in India

So...

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/britain-stole-45-trillion-india-181206124830851.html

Thanks for some nice communist website sources

lmao

Aljazeera is notorious for being the chief source of communists to describe capitalist "atrocities"

https://www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/this-economist-says-britain-took-away-usd-45-trillion-from-india-in-173-years/story/292352.html

this seems like BS lemme look it up

That's some retarded economic research. Churchill was a retarded leader yes, but her figures are exacerbated especially since she has no real data to examine

Also it's not a bad thing to get resources to market

That's a retarded nationalist viewpoint

The British did the dialectically logical thing to do

Seeing as you are a free marketer capitalist

I can understand why you think exploitation is justifiable

But that doesn't make you any less of cuck

And a lot of the money earned from their profits were reinvested into economic infrastructure which the Indians use today

The British weren't pouring that money into the crowns treasury lmao

"I mean yeah they didnt pay for goods with their own money and instead used Indian tax money but the company made railroads which they continued to use to exploit the colony so its ok"

That's a moral argument

Morals are subjective

Colonization cannot be objectively immoral

Sorry bucko

But economic data is measurable, and the world economy benefitted as a result of the goods going to market

So if I had you pay taxes for the money you earned from working to manufacture or cultivate goods that I buy with your tax dollars and sell for my profit, it would be justified because it makes me more money than just being fair about it?

Fair?

Lmao

Moral argument again

railroads were originally built for private companies all over the world
this does not proclude benefits from these structures which are still used today

So you believe that exploitation is justified and you would be fine when put subject to it? @Orson Krennic

did they benefit from the exploitation?

Exploitation isn't immoral

So

if the answer is yes then the exploitation is moral

Because nothing is immoral

So you believe exploitation is moral because in the scenario that it benefits you the individual?

if it benefits the nation then it is moral

So if you were cucked from the fruits of your labor, because it benefited the state you would be fine with it?

lol this is your brain on marxism

That doesnt answer my question