unless it defied the national interest

and that is essentially defined by the leadership

hitler style was more capitalist than anything

@Maksim it wasn't pro or anti capitalist

in its words

in practice

More like a middle ground between the 2

it was very similar to the US economy during war time

extremely similar actually

I would argue more or less identical

No

The government worked off of contracts

and the nazi-era coprorations can refuse those contracts

even during wartime

that isn't inherently capitalist

Nazi nationalised things like healthcare and unions

it is more capitalist than anything

capitalism is distinctly characterised by free market economics

the nazis did not care about the free market

The nazis also privatized a lot @1488

@Maksim things that are not people things

Public utilities

You don't need to nationalise things like railways and things like that

You do

Or at the very least subsidise them temp or intiate price control

Subsides are good

its 1:21am im not gonna get into a full argument just gonna say that rn

argument/debate

Im not exactly, Nazbol, but eh

close enough

@Maksim Thanks fam

Nazbol to me is an acceptable ideology

It is the same as strasserism essentially

According to your test your a market socialist

on the economic axis of things yes

That's means that your most likely a third positionist

I allow private industry to exist, but if they act in any way against the state or people (like price hikes or artifically limiting stock etc etc) they get their CEOs shot and the company gets nationalized

Far left economics but not full on socialism

tha

that's literally natsoc

and thats exactly what they did