and it worked well

Nazbol is fully communist

Natsoc is ment to be a different kind of sociallism that had a progressive economic system but not full on socialism

Natsoc was always meant to respect private property

unless it defied the national interest

and that is essentially defined by the leadership

hitler style was more capitalist than anything

@Maksim it wasn't pro or anti capitalist

in its words

in practice

More like a middle ground between the 2

it was very similar to the US economy during war time

extremely similar actually

I would argue more or less identical

No

The government worked off of contracts

and the nazi-era coprorations can refuse those contracts

even during wartime

that isn't inherently capitalist

Nazi nationalised things like healthcare and unions

it is more capitalist than anything

capitalism is distinctly characterised by free market economics

the nazis did not care about the free market

The nazis also privatized a lot @1488

@Maksim things that are not people things

Public utilities

You don't need to nationalise things like railways and things like that

You do

Or at the very least subsidise them temp or intiate price control

Subsides are good

its 1:21am im not gonna get into a full argument just gonna say that rn

argument/debate

Im not exactly, Nazbol, but eh

close enough

@Maksim Thanks fam

Nazbol to me is an acceptable ideology

It is the same as strasserism essentially

According to your test your a market socialist

on the economic axis of things yes

That's means that your most likely a third positionist