Message from @The Desert Fox V
Discord ID: 656924455158808579
no thats not what i said
i said he pursued an alternative to capital
@M240DualWielder it was interventionist
But still capitalist
Mixed economy
Would be a better term
Hitler didn't nationalize that much stuff though
the ussr was also a state capitalist country
but they obviously intended on becoming communist up until a certain point
They were state socialist
everything was effectively nationalised via the DAF doe @The Desert Fox V
well
practically
@Spergerger regulated but not really nationalised
a distinction without a difference imo but whatev
Regulationism is different
Pretty sure the businesses still chose prices and stuff
yeh yeh ig he could have gone further and such
The window of choosable prices was just narrowed
why i said effectively ofc
But they weren't
ofc
where has that commie gone?
Was he a communist m
I thought he was just being strasserist
Or something
i bet hes gonna come back in like 5 mins with a bunch of horror stories about ns german labour rights
and be like '' but they couldnt strike!!!''
Striking is a good revolutionary tool but is bad if you actually want the country to run
Labour courts>striking
he also banned lockouts as well
Good
Did Hitler actually implement labour courts to mediate disputes?
I know he planned to
they had workers council i believe
which are similar
It was a method of evaluated capitalism.
it depends on how profit is being used @Spergerger returns on capital can be used to benefit people or line the wallets of businessmen.
They aren't protecting capitalists if the capital is owned by the state or by a collective
It's a big difference
From humble beginnings.