Message from @The Desert Fox V
Discord ID: 656924174018674729
absolute nonsense
I mean, Hitler's economy was capitalist, but he wasn't a capitalist. What I mean is basically the Third Reich's economy was capitalist but this was just cause Hitler hadn't finished all the economic reforms he would've done.
i think that the increase on returns is easily explained by tech advancements and longer working hours due to war probably
>hitlers economy was capitalist
Even though it wasnt...
Okay
no thats not what i said
i said he pursued an alternative to capital
@M240DualWielder it was interventionist
But still capitalist
Mixed economy
Would be a better term
Hitler didn't nationalize that much stuff though
the ussr was also a state capitalist country
but they obviously intended on becoming communist up until a certain point
They were state socialist
everything was effectively nationalised via the DAF doe @The Desert Fox V
well
practically
@Spergerger regulated but not really nationalised
a distinction without a difference imo but whatev
Regulationism is different
yeh yeh ig he could have gone further and such
The window of choosable prices was just narrowed
why i said effectively ofc
But they weren't
Is my point
ofc
where has that commie gone?
Was he a communist m
I thought he was just being strasserist
Or something
i bet hes gonna come back in like 5 mins with a bunch of horror stories about ns german labour rights
and be like '' but they couldnt strike!!!''
Striking is a good revolutionary tool but is bad if you actually want the country to run
Labour courts>striking
he also banned lockouts as well
Good
Did Hitler actually implement labour courts to mediate disputes?
I know he planned to
they had workers council i believe
which are similar
It was a method of evaluated capitalism.