Message from @The Desert Fox V
Discord ID: 656923907604873236
how does more profit being made = more capitalism
when the soviet union industrialised it had greater returns on capital
did it get more capitalist???
was the tzar a socialist
trying to save his country from evil capitalist backed communocapitalists?
absolute nonsense
I mean, Hitler's economy was capitalist, but he wasn't a capitalist. What I mean is basically the Third Reich's economy was capitalist but this was just cause Hitler hadn't finished all the economic reforms he would've done.
i think that the increase on returns is easily explained by tech advancements and longer working hours due to war probably
>hitlers economy was capitalist
Even though it wasnt...
Okay
no thats not what i said
i said he pursued an alternative to capital
@M240DualWielder it was interventionist
But still capitalist
Mixed economy
Would be a better term
Hitler didn't nationalize that much stuff though
the ussr was also a state capitalist country
but they obviously intended on becoming communist up until a certain point
They were state socialist
everything was effectively nationalised via the DAF doe @The Desert Fox V
well
practically
a distinction without a difference imo but whatev
Regulationism is different
Pretty sure the businesses still chose prices and stuff
yeh yeh ig he could have gone further and such
The window of choosable prices was just narrowed
why i said effectively ofc
But they weren't
Is my point
ofc
where has that commie gone?
Was he a communist m
I thought he was just being strasserist
Or something
i bet hes gonna come back in like 5 mins with a bunch of horror stories about ns german labour rights
and be like '' but they couldnt strike!!!''
Striking is a good revolutionary tool but is bad if you actually want the country to run
Labour courts>striking
he also banned lockouts as well
Good
Did Hitler actually implement labour courts to mediate disputes?
I know he planned to