Message from @Kazimir Malevich

Discord ID: 540900171949539368


2019-02-01 14:21:34 UTC  

You dont know what the term means

2019-02-01 14:21:43 UTC  

I’ve used the same definition width for both

2019-02-01 14:21:44 UTC  

Although it can refer to this

2019-02-01 14:21:52 UTC  

typically when viewing it in the context of the United States

2019-02-01 14:21:52 UTC  

Mixed economies are socialist and capitalism elements mixed in

2019-02-01 14:21:53 UTC  

it means

2019-02-01 14:22:03 UTC  

mixed between a command economy and a market economy

2019-02-01 14:22:11 UTC  

@Kazimir Malevich is North Korea a democratic republic

2019-02-01 14:22:23 UTC  

Not...all....socialists....want...a...command...economy <:brainlet:508484031625691156>

2019-02-01 14:22:31 UTC  

Most don't

2019-02-01 14:22:33 UTC  

Mixed is between a capitalist or socialist economy. Market forces mixed between interventionist policies

2019-02-01 14:22:40 UTC  

most do

2019-02-01 14:22:45 UTC  

Only a few don’t

2019-02-01 14:23:34 UTC  

Nope

2019-02-01 14:23:40 UTC  

Yes they do

2019-02-01 14:23:41 UTC  

Although that is an example of a mixed economy

2019-02-01 14:23:51 UTC  

it's not the only form

2019-02-01 14:23:54 UTC  

It **is** a mixed economy

2019-02-01 14:23:59 UTC  

Thats the only form you can get

2019-02-01 14:24:03 UTC  

There’s nothing else

2019-02-01 14:24:10 UTC  

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ There are countless examples of North Korea going against the fictionary definition of "democratic". You go against the dictionary definitions of both "capitalism" and "socialism".

2019-02-01 14:24:22 UTC  

Your analogy is unfounded in reality.

2019-02-01 14:24:24 UTC  

What?

2019-02-01 14:24:26 UTC  

LOL

2019-02-01 14:24:36 UTC  

North Korea is clearly not democratic

2019-02-01 14:24:43 UTC  

The only reason why you're playing these childish games with definition is because your argument makes no sense without them. You argue disingenuously, simply because it's the only way you can even attempt to come across as reasonable.

2019-02-01 14:24:53 UTC  

No it’s because these definitions are correct

2019-02-01 14:25:29 UTC  

Also, appeal to definition is a fallacy for a reason

2019-02-01 14:25:35 UTC  

@Kazimir Malevich but there are many other analogies

2019-02-01 14:25:42 UTC  

Fallacy fallacy exists aswell @The Big Oof

2019-02-01 14:25:48 UTC  

Non argument.

2019-02-01 14:25:51 UTC  

Calling yourself something does not make your self such

2019-02-01 14:25:56 UTC  

All of which are most likely unbased in reality.

2019-02-01 14:26:03 UTC  

It is indeed a fallacy in your case, and I will explain how,

2019-02-01 14:26:52 UTC  

I really don’t care about fallacies, just that these definitions are true. A mixed economy is a mix between socialist intervention and capitalist market forces

2019-02-01 14:27:00 UTC  

You are attempting to use the definition's broadest meaning possible to defend the strictest meaning possible of capitalism.

This is a fallacy, and this is why it's a fallacy. This is disingenuous arguing @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

2019-02-01 14:27:06 UTC  

Capitalism is the free market , socialism is the state of worker ownership

2019-02-01 14:27:08 UTC  

I am a man. Is some twerp came to me and said "My definition of a man is somebody who has six legs" I will laugh at him, since said definition is only held by a minority opinion.

2019-02-01 14:27:16 UTC  

`I really don’t care about fallacies`

2019-02-01 14:27:23 UTC  

Your sentence didn’t make any sense @The Big Oof

2019-02-01 14:27:25 UTC  

Read again