Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

Discord ID: 540900991269208075


2019-02-01 14:24:10 UTC  

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ There are countless examples of North Korea going against the fictionary definition of "democratic". You go against the dictionary definitions of both "capitalism" and "socialism".

2019-02-01 14:24:22 UTC  

Your analogy is unfounded in reality.

2019-02-01 14:24:24 UTC  

What?

2019-02-01 14:24:26 UTC  

LOL

2019-02-01 14:24:36 UTC  

North Korea is clearly not democratic

2019-02-01 14:24:43 UTC  

The only reason why you're playing these childish games with definition is because your argument makes no sense without them. You argue disingenuously, simply because it's the only way you can even attempt to come across as reasonable.

2019-02-01 14:24:53 UTC  

No it’s because these definitions are correct

2019-02-01 14:25:29 UTC  

Also, appeal to definition is a fallacy for a reason

2019-02-01 14:25:35 UTC  

@Kazimir Malevich but there are many other analogies

2019-02-01 14:25:42 UTC  

Fallacy fallacy exists aswell @The Big Oof

2019-02-01 14:25:48 UTC  

Non argument.

2019-02-01 14:25:51 UTC  

Calling yourself something does not make your self such

2019-02-01 14:25:56 UTC  

All of which are most likely unbased in reality.

2019-02-01 14:26:03 UTC  

It is indeed a fallacy in your case, and I will explain how,

2019-02-01 14:26:52 UTC  

I really don’t care about fallacies, just that these definitions are true. A mixed economy is a mix between socialist intervention and capitalist market forces

2019-02-01 14:27:00 UTC  

You are attempting to use the definition's broadest meaning possible to defend the strictest meaning possible of capitalism.

This is a fallacy, and this is why it's a fallacy. This is disingenuous arguing @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

2019-02-01 14:27:06 UTC  

Capitalism is the free market , socialism is the state of worker ownership

2019-02-01 14:27:08 UTC  

I am a man. Is some twerp came to me and said "My definition of a man is somebody who has six legs" I will laugh at him, since said definition is only held by a minority opinion.

2019-02-01 14:27:16 UTC  

`I really don’t care about fallacies`

2019-02-01 14:27:23 UTC  

Your sentence didn’t make any sense @The Big Oof

2019-02-01 14:27:25 UTC  

Read again

2019-02-01 14:27:52 UTC  

How about instead of making a positive claim, you make the claim AND give reasoning behind it?

2019-02-01 14:27:58 UTC  

Which you won't do

2019-02-01 14:28:02 UTC  

I did

2019-02-01 14:28:05 UTC  

Why is your definition of capitalism valid and not say Marx's who coined the term?

2019-02-01 14:28:05 UTC  

I have above

2019-02-01 14:28:20 UTC  

`Your sentence didn’t make any sense`

`I did`

`I have above`

2019-02-01 14:28:25 UTC  

this entire conversation in a nutshell

2019-02-01 14:28:34 UTC  

why would his definition be correct but mine wouldn’t !

2019-02-01 14:28:37 UTC  

>makes a claim

"Substantiate it"

>"I did"

2019-02-01 14:28:38 UTC  

What type of question is that

2019-02-01 14:28:50 UTC  

Yeah I did gamer Stalin

2019-02-01 14:28:52 UTC  

Many times

2019-02-01 14:29:05 UTC  

He created the word

2019-02-01 14:29:09 UTC  

```Your sentence didn’t make any sense

I did

I have above```

2019-02-01 14:29:17 UTC  

Where did you explain why my sentence made no sense?

2019-02-01 14:29:21 UTC  

So logically shouldn't he get to define it?

2019-02-01 14:29:38 UTC  

As in literacy , it didn’t make any sense.

2019-02-01 14:29:45 UTC  

Re read what you said

2019-02-01 14:29:56 UTC  

```You are attempting to use the definition's broadest meaning possible to defend the strictest meaning possible of capitalism.

This is a fallacy, and this is why it's a fallacy. This is disingenuous arguing ```

2019-02-01 14:29:58 UTC  

My definition of " @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ's mum" is "A person who I am engaged with in a hot sweaty romance".