Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

Discord ID: 540899794336481281


2019-02-01 14:20:48 UTC  

No your example doesn’t

2019-02-01 14:20:56 UTC  

It doesn’t make sense literally

2019-02-01 14:21:16 UTC  

My point is socialism actively tried to restrict and/or abolish the market

2019-02-01 14:21:18 UTC  

You're really stretching it with your definitions. You're taking the broadest definition of socialism possible, and then using it in defense of the strictest definition of capitalism possible.

2019-02-01 14:21:19 UTC  

Also

2019-02-01 14:21:20 UTC  

another note

2019-02-01 14:21:22 UTC  

By using interventionist methods

2019-02-01 14:21:31 UTC  

"mixed economy" doesn't mean mixed between capitalism and socialism

2019-02-01 14:21:32 UTC  

Who are the people who call themselves capitalists but are not ancaps?

2019-02-01 14:21:34 UTC  

You dont know what the term means

2019-02-01 14:21:43 UTC  

I’ve used the same definition width for both

2019-02-01 14:21:44 UTC  

Although it can refer to this

2019-02-01 14:21:52 UTC  

typically when viewing it in the context of the United States

2019-02-01 14:21:52 UTC  

Mixed economies are socialist and capitalism elements mixed in

2019-02-01 14:21:53 UTC  

it means

2019-02-01 14:22:03 UTC  

mixed between a command economy and a market economy

2019-02-01 14:22:11 UTC  

@Kazimir Malevich is North Korea a democratic republic

2019-02-01 14:22:23 UTC  

Not...all....socialists....want...a...command...economy <:brainlet:508484031625691156>

2019-02-01 14:22:31 UTC  

Most don't

2019-02-01 14:22:33 UTC  

Mixed is between a capitalist or socialist economy. Market forces mixed between interventionist policies

2019-02-01 14:22:40 UTC  

most do

2019-02-01 14:22:45 UTC  

Only a few don’t

2019-02-01 14:23:34 UTC  

Nope

2019-02-01 14:23:40 UTC  

Yes they do

2019-02-01 14:23:41 UTC  

Although that is an example of a mixed economy

2019-02-01 14:23:51 UTC  

it's not the only form

2019-02-01 14:23:54 UTC  

It **is** a mixed economy

2019-02-01 14:23:59 UTC  

Thats the only form you can get

2019-02-01 14:24:03 UTC  

There’s nothing else

2019-02-01 14:24:10 UTC  

@sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ There are countless examples of North Korea going against the fictionary definition of "democratic". You go against the dictionary definitions of both "capitalism" and "socialism".

2019-02-01 14:24:22 UTC  

Your analogy is unfounded in reality.

2019-02-01 14:24:24 UTC  

What?

2019-02-01 14:24:26 UTC  

LOL

2019-02-01 14:24:36 UTC  

North Korea is clearly not democratic

2019-02-01 14:24:43 UTC  

The only reason why you're playing these childish games with definition is because your argument makes no sense without them. You argue disingenuously, simply because it's the only way you can even attempt to come across as reasonable.

2019-02-01 14:24:53 UTC  

No it’s because these definitions are correct

2019-02-01 14:25:29 UTC  

Also, appeal to definition is a fallacy for a reason

2019-02-01 14:25:35 UTC  

@Kazimir Malevich but there are many other analogies

2019-02-01 14:25:42 UTC  

Fallacy fallacy exists aswell @The Big Oof

2019-02-01 14:25:48 UTC  

Non argument.

2019-02-01 14:25:51 UTC  

Calling yourself something does not make your self such