Message from @Rex Carthaginis

Discord ID: 540901409718272010


2019-02-01 14:26:03 UTC  

It is indeed a fallacy in your case, and I will explain how,

2019-02-01 14:26:52 UTC  

I really don’t care about fallacies, just that these definitions are true. A mixed economy is a mix between socialist intervention and capitalist market forces

2019-02-01 14:27:00 UTC  

You are attempting to use the definition's broadest meaning possible to defend the strictest meaning possible of capitalism.

This is a fallacy, and this is why it's a fallacy. This is disingenuous arguing @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

2019-02-01 14:27:06 UTC  

Capitalism is the free market , socialism is the state of worker ownership

2019-02-01 14:27:08 UTC  

I am a man. Is some twerp came to me and said "My definition of a man is somebody who has six legs" I will laugh at him, since said definition is only held by a minority opinion.

2019-02-01 14:27:16 UTC  

`I really don’t care about fallacies`

2019-02-01 14:27:23 UTC  

Your sentence didn’t make any sense @The Big Oof

2019-02-01 14:27:25 UTC  

Read again

2019-02-01 14:27:52 UTC  

How about instead of making a positive claim, you make the claim AND give reasoning behind it?

2019-02-01 14:27:58 UTC  

Which you won't do

2019-02-01 14:28:02 UTC  

I did

2019-02-01 14:28:05 UTC  

Why is your definition of capitalism valid and not say Marx's who coined the term?

2019-02-01 14:28:05 UTC  

I have above

2019-02-01 14:28:20 UTC  

`Your sentence didn’t make any sense`

`I did`

`I have above`

2019-02-01 14:28:25 UTC  

this entire conversation in a nutshell

2019-02-01 14:28:34 UTC  

why would his definition be correct but mine wouldn’t !

2019-02-01 14:28:37 UTC  

>makes a claim

"Substantiate it"

>"I did"

2019-02-01 14:28:38 UTC  

What type of question is that

2019-02-01 14:28:50 UTC  

Yeah I did gamer Stalin

2019-02-01 14:28:52 UTC  

Many times

2019-02-01 14:29:05 UTC  

He created the word

2019-02-01 14:29:09 UTC  

```Your sentence didn’t make any sense

I did

I have above```

2019-02-01 14:29:17 UTC  

Where did you explain why my sentence made no sense?

2019-02-01 14:29:21 UTC  

So logically shouldn't he get to define it?

2019-02-01 14:29:38 UTC  

As in literacy , it didn’t make any sense.

2019-02-01 14:29:45 UTC  

Re read what you said

2019-02-01 14:29:56 UTC  

```You are attempting to use the definition's broadest meaning possible to defend the strictest meaning possible of capitalism.

This is a fallacy, and this is why it's a fallacy. This is disingenuous arguing ```

2019-02-01 14:29:58 UTC  

My definition of " @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ's mum" is "A person who I am engaged with in a hot sweaty romance".

2019-02-01 14:30:02 UTC  

Someone tell me how this sentence made no sense

2019-02-01 14:30:04 UTC  

Yes the top doesn’t make sense

2019-02-01 14:30:11 UTC  

it indeed does

2019-02-01 14:30:21 UTC  

Broadest meaning possible to defend the strict meaning possible?

2019-02-01 14:30:25 UTC  

Yes

2019-02-01 14:30:27 UTC  

Makes no sense

2019-02-01 14:31:32 UTC  

Broadest meaning of socialism to defend the narrowest meaning of capitalism

2019-02-01 14:31:47 UTC  

There we go

2019-02-01 14:31:48 UTC  

No, you're just a retard, but I'll explain anyway, which is something you'll never do with your claims despite insisting you do.

The broadest meaning in this case is referring to this silly definition of socialism, and the strictest definition is referring to your personal definition of capitalism.

"Socialism is when the government does stuff, therefore, any intervention is not capitalism"

2019-02-01 14:32:07 UTC  

But I didn’t use the broadest or strictest

2019-02-01 14:32:13 UTC  

The width of the definitions were the same

2019-02-01 14:32:23 UTC  

Explain how they are the same.

2019-02-01 14:32:26 UTC  

Socialism is when the state or workers own the mOp