Everyone agreeing or disagreeing with you doesn't make you right or wrong. I would just like to point out that you've done a poor job of convincing anyone.

Honestly I don’t care what edgy socialists here would think

I’m just arguing my point

Argument requires a small amount of compromise and wiggle room.

you haven't even convinced me, someone which, I will reiterate, basically agrees with you on a lot

You can argue it all day, you're wasting your breath.

Nor do I care about convincing you

I’m not talking

time to rethink your arguments

Nope

bro thing is very simple

My arguments stand

you have burgoise government

that likes money

so sets up monpolies

just one of examples

wait a socialists agree monopolies are created by the state

That’s a new

They don't. You won't even allow discussion of the history of socialism, playing these childish games with webster's definition

doesn’t matter

If the history of socialism means nothing, then any word can be given any meaning

Capitalism is state intervention

the history of socialism does prove my point however, things like USSR

leizzes faire is when there is no govenrment intervention

The USSR wasn't socialist, it was the closest thing to socialism that will ever be accomplished.

Also, socialism has a deeper history than "the USSR"

It was socialist

it makes sense that you think that

But yes I know it has a deeper historu

But USSR is fairly old, 1920 stuff

Considering you use a Marxist-Leninist definition of socialism

Socialism predates the USSR by several decades....

Yes I know

I never said it didn’t

However the USSR was a socialist economy

State owned the MoP

Okay, so name a socialist pre-Stalin that said market intervention was socialism

You named the USSR

if you know a lot about socialism

Just give me a name

They probably didn’t say anything like that, they just wanted to abolish the market.

As Marx said aswell, socialism was the transition to communism