Message from @dani(el)
Discord ID: 291764875016011776
total 100
ok good night kids im heckin tired
i'm not addressing the current standards
the issue is that youcan be accused of something, but be innocent...that is the issue.
yes, which is why i'm not saying
the current stanards? what the fuck does that even mean?
let courts decide as they stand today
stop changing subjects
i, uh
i'm literally on the same subject
you told me to answer "why should a child rapist live"
and you said
"we kill 99 child rapist-murdurers
and 1 innocent"
my answer: because some people would be found wrongfully guilty and an innocent will die while the rapist if free
oh man dude
@Sarcastro that point is actually a good one
i just told you to disregard current standards
i don't agree with the judicial system as it stands
what i asked WAS
if he serves lifetime or a sentance and new evidence are found we can free him. we cant UNKILL him
@dani(el) courts can't be perfect. That's why I'm against death penalty
courts CANT be perfect, people CANT be perfect
repeat:
define 'current standards' and 'new standards'
@Sarcastro you won
^^
he definitly wins
@Deleted User yay? do I get reaction emojis?
because he's addressing the court system as it stands
and i'm not trying to argue for the death penalty within this judicial system
anyone here like warsling
define 'current standards' and 'new standards'
You're arguing hypothetical, then.
i've been in and out of court my entire life
judges are easily manipulated, evidence is easily manipulated
well in the hypothetical future standard of behavior we **will not have child rapists** so death penalty will be useless
AGAIN: hypothetical scenario
that's a different scenario, we're discussing this one
we could go back and forth all night making alternate universes
I'm asking for the third time