i, uh

i'm literally on the same subject

you told me to answer "why should a child rapist live"

and you said

"we kill 99 child rapist-murdurers
and 1 innocent"

my answer: because some people would be found wrongfully guilty and an innocent will die while the rapist if free

oh man dude

@Sarcastro that point is actually a good one

i just told you to disregard current standards

i don't agree with the judicial system as it stands

what i asked WAS

if he serves lifetime or a sentance and new evidence are found we can free him. we cant UNKILL him

omfg

@dani(el) courts can't be perfect. That's why I'm against death penalty

courts CANT be perfect, people CANT be perfect

repeat:

define 'current standards' and 'new standards'

@Sarcastro you won

^^

he definitly wins

@Deleted User yay? do I get reaction emojis?

because he's addressing the court system as it stands

and i'm not trying to argue for the death penalty within this judicial system

anyone here like warsling

define 'current standards' and 'new standards'

You're arguing hypothetical, then.

i've been in and out of court my entire life

judges are easily manipulated, evidence is easily manipulated

well in the hypothetical future standard of behavior we **will not have child rapists** so death penalty will be useless

AGAIN: hypothetical scenario

that's a different scenario, we're discussing this one

we could go back and forth all night making alternate universes

I'm asking for the third time

define 'current standards' and 'new standards'

i like wrastling

@dani(el) you are flailing

i just did half of that

if you wont answer I will ask Mike to shut you off

**NOT AN ARGUMENT**

bro

slow down