Message from @dani(el)
Discord ID: 291768075534073867
oh man
@Deleted User I tip my fedora my friend
back at it again
wit hte white vans
damn daniel
dani, how the fuck will you reduce the false positive rate to 0?
s i t u a t i o n a l
not an answer
how
that..
was an answer.........
well then your answer is shit and not an argument
like i said dude
only in cases with 100% evidence
Ok, give me an example, I'll give you a counterexample
of the S I T U A T I O N
omg this debate is still going?
its really not going anywhere honestly
he's kind of just taking what i say and throwing it 10 metres to the right and then addressing what i've said
so you cant give an example of a
S I T U A T I O N
I
T
U
A
T
I
O
N
scroll up
I know, but for this to work I need you to define it again so there will be no confusion.
If you want, just copy
MHHH DADDDYYYYYYYYY
Did someone say situation ?
you only fucking kill people when there is no doubt. i would not go by current standards. surprisingly, i'd set the bar pretty high to murder someone. like i said, public with video evidence is one situation i could think of in which you couldn't really justify anything that happened
*current standards* is a really really blurry term
it really depends on the judge
which is where the fault is
I need an example of a situation where there can be 100% no doubt I raped someone
we will never have perfect judges
like i said, public, you're raping a 6-year-old girl, street cameras have caught it, crowd of people surrounding you
got it
that's pretty unjustifiable
well that's precisely why violent punishments are not acceptable
because judges fuck it up
like i said, hypothetical
I will give you a few examples how you can be framed in it?