Message from @Sarcastro
Discord ID: 291767811481534465
cuz you haven't done anything but take what i'm saying out of context and fail to make me see the error of anything i'm proposing
@dani(el) give him a trial, if he can be proven guilty without a reasonable doubt, put him in jail
@Sarcastro give him all the women he needs. he's earned it.
why jail?
would you prefer kindergarden
i'd prefer 6 feet under
wbu?
@Sarcastro I appreciate your logic and reasoning skills.
I'd prefer you being wrongly accused of rape and NOT be put in the ground?
oh man
@Deleted User I tip my fedora my friend
back at it again
wit hte white vans
damn daniel
dani, how the fuck will you reduce the false positive rate to 0?
s i t u a t i o n a l
not an answer
how
that..
was an answer.........
like i said dude
only in cases with 100% evidence
Ok, give me an example, I'll give you a counterexample
of the S I T U A T I O N
omg this debate is still going?
its really not going anywhere honestly
he's kind of just taking what i say and throwing it 10 metres to the right and then addressing what i've said
so you cant give an example of a
S I T U A T I O N
I
T
U
A
T
I
O
N
i already did
scroll up
I know, but for this to work I need you to define it again so there will be no confusion.
If you want, just copy
MHHH DADDDYYYYYYYYY
Did someone say situation ?
you only fucking kill people when there is no doubt. i would not go by current standards. surprisingly, i'd set the bar pretty high to murder someone. like i said, public with video evidence is one situation i could think of in which you couldn't really justify anything that happened
*current standards* is a really really blurry term
it really depends on the judge
which is where the fault is
I need an example of a situation where there can be 100% no doubt I raped someone