omg this debate is still going?

its really not going anywhere honestly

he's kind of just taking what i say and throwing it 10 metres to the right and then addressing what i've said

so you cant give an example of a
S I T U A T I O N
I
T
U
A
T
I
O
N

i already did

scroll up

I know, but for this to work I need you to define it again so there will be no confusion.

If you want, just copy

MHHH DADDDYYYYYYYYY

Did someone say situation ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USriZAMR2nA

you only fucking kill people when there is no doubt. i would not go by current standards. surprisingly, i'd set the bar pretty high to murder someone. like i said, public with video evidence is one situation i could think of in which you couldn't really justify anything that happened

*current standards* is a really really blurry term

it really depends on the judge

which is where the fault is

I need an example of a situation where there can be 100% no doubt I raped someone

we will never have perfect judges

like i said, public, you're raping a 6-year-old girl, street cameras have caught it, crowd of people surrounding you

got it

that's pretty unjustifiable

well that's precisely why violent punishments are not acceptable

because judges fuck it up

like i said, hypothetical

I will give you a few examples how you can be framed in it?

https://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/dec/01/109-women-prosecuted-false-rape-allegations

will you allow me to do that without interupting?

uh

its a chat how can i interrupt you

just wait until I finish the scenarios

no, dude i got it

crowd is paid actors

rapist is being blackmailed

here's my argument: i don't care

??

u dont care?

i don't care if someone's being blackmailed

🌮 ima just leave this taco here... take good care of it.

what?

Taco

what if you were bieing blackmailed

if you're raping a 6-year-old, imo, there's no reason to not die