Message from @snakeeater

Discord ID: 551892329217261598


2019-03-03 19:37:34 UTC  

HWALP PLS

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/507035890640486411/551850676188086321/Skjermbilde_2019-03-03_kl._20.36.40.png

2019-03-03 19:37:42 UTC  

2019-03-03 19:48:06 UTC  

2019-03-03 20:26:42 UTC  

2019-03-03 20:29:31 UTC  

I am swiss

2019-03-03 20:40:10 UTC  

@David V remove all your specialists

2019-03-03 20:40:19 UTC  

and change your ideology

2019-03-03 21:34:41 UTC  

Well, @Kazimir Malevich , you little smelly turd, theyre red pills, if you knew anything about it, you know that you use red pills when it makes sense to. Depending on where people are you have to bring them along to understand the truth of a situation. Theyre not all for your level, in fact theyre not even for you. Theyre for you to have as tools to use when you find it makes sense to, you little contrarian worm.

2019-03-03 22:10:00 UTC  

You misunderstand

2019-03-03 22:10:12 UTC  

Kazimir is a redpill in and of himself

2019-03-03 22:10:50 UTC  

kazimir *IS* the redpill

2019-03-03 22:14:21 UTC  

2019-03-03 22:14:41 UTC  

Who else kazpilled here?

2019-03-03 22:20:41 UTC  

Freeeom you statist fags

2019-03-03 22:21:08 UTC  

Is there such a thing as to much freedom?

2019-03-03 22:22:11 UTC  

I would say yes. For instance, most would support libel and slander laws

2019-03-03 22:22:26 UTC  

statism gud

2019-03-03 22:22:36 UTC  

That limits a freedom to tell a lie in exchange for security

2019-03-03 22:22:53 UTC  

Freedom

2019-03-03 22:23:00 UTC  

Ello

2019-03-03 22:23:04 UTC  

This is a false dichotomy

2019-03-03 22:23:17 UTC  

The argument is that slandering someone violates their freedom, but that thought process isn't too different from saying hate speech violates the freedom of minorities

2019-03-03 22:23:22 UTC  

In New York VS Ferber the ACLU pushed for child pornography to be protected under the 1st amendment. I for one argue that it does not fall under thr 1st amendment and the Supreme Court agreed. But that is a limitation of freedom to some extent correct?

2019-03-03 22:23:40 UTC  

>aclu

2019-03-03 22:23:46 UTC  

Freedom

2019-03-03 22:23:47 UTC  

The ACLU pushes for child porn to be protected under the first admendment

2019-03-03 22:23:47 UTC  

If I must choose, security because you can't exercise any rights or liberties if you're dead

2019-03-03 22:23:49 UTC  

wtf

2019-03-03 22:23:52 UTC  

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

2019-03-03 22:24:50 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/507035890640486411/551892770227224613/1498260768283.png

2019-03-03 22:25:02 UTC  

Security definitely

2019-03-03 22:25:09 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/507035890640486411/551892853081636895/2812_THUMB_IPAD.jpg

2019-03-03 22:25:14 UTC  

fellas better debate topic should we just get rid of new york

2019-03-03 22:25:40 UTC  

Civilization and the higher values/principles of society are based on the foundation of power, violence, and security. First you must establish a stable order where there is one dominant force who rules and then people living under this dominion may develop sophisticated ideals

2019-03-03 22:26:27 UTC  

In other words, freedom depends on security.

2019-03-03 22:26:39 UTC  

2019-03-03 22:26:49 UTC  

As bad as it sounds that's true snake.

2019-03-03 22:27:13 UTC  

wanting more freedom nowadays is translated to "ME WANT MORE DOPAMINE"

2019-03-03 22:27:39 UTC  

Wanting more vs defending what we have.

2019-03-03 22:27:47 UTC  

^

2019-03-03 22:29:48 UTC  

100% pure freedom is anarchy. And in my opinion anarchy is a perfect society that can not truely exist in a imperfect world.