Message from @Jordan Poole
Discord ID: 551863043944874004
Hi
Hello
Howdy @lewis0917 @RΓ€serneger @kaas/is/lekker @Ambrosia . Welcome to the Nationalist Union. If you want ranks go to <#507040923884978176> and use ?ranks to see all available ranks and use ?rank enterrankname so that you can join one be sure to check out our <#507040801860091914> and <#521916756852342784>
Many people call Hitler a nationalist (maybe sometimes from the ideology national socialism) in my opinon a nationalist wants to keep borders strong. Hitler wanted to invade at least all of europe making him a imperialist doesn't it? Opinions?
Howdy @Deli.v2#1988 @Gourune#6694 @Mattπ. Welcome to the Nationalist Union. If you want ranks go to <#507040923884978176> and use ?ranks to see all available ranks and use ?rank enterrankname so that you can join one be sure to check out our <#507040801860091914> and <#521916756852342784>
@πΏπππππππππππ π²πππππππππ you should get join messages somewere else then general π€
hey
stop that
I miss Bearer.
ello
He big oof
HWALP PLS
I am swiss
and change your ideology
Well, @Kazimir Malevich , you little smelly turd, theyre red pills, if you knew anything about it, you know that you use red pills when it makes sense to. Depending on where people are you have to bring them along to understand the truth of a situation. Theyre not all for your level, in fact theyre not even for you. Theyre for you to have as tools to use when you find it makes sense to, you little contrarian worm.
You misunderstand
Kazimir is a redpill in and of himself
kazimir *IS* the redpill
Who else kazpilled here?
Freeeom you statist fags
Is there such a thing as to much freedom?
I would say yes. For instance, most would support libel and slander laws
statism gud
That limits a freedom to tell a lie in exchange for security
Freedom
Ello
This is a false dichotomy
The argument is that slandering someone violates their freedom, but that thought process isn't too different from saying hate speech violates the freedom of minorities
In New York VS Ferber the ACLU pushed for child pornography to be protected under the 1st amendment. I for one argue that it does not fall under thr 1st amendment and the Supreme Court agreed. But that is a limitation of freedom to some extent correct?
>aclu