You brought up that trump is pushing to remove regulations out of nowhere which had nothing to do with what we were talking about

oh shit heres the ace attorney objections

Thats been the whole reason for the argument

This was originally about you claiming trump magically brought back 2.5 million jobs and raised stock market growth

Which is retarded because there's hundreds of factors when it comes to job growth and the stock market

Yes, and one of those factors is politics

Cool

That's 1 in a 100

Donald Trump’s actions led to the jobs being created, as well as the stock market growing. Lmao

Taking credit for stock market growth is stupid

You have to understand that the president signing trade deals, raising and lowering tariffs, and altering taxes play a good 70 percent into the stock markets growth, right?

I think this argument should stop, it is useless.

70%?

Like look at all that’s happening around us. Obama didn’t do this, so who did? Lol

Are you fucking serious?

Dead serious. Nothing goes into trade without it passing into the government first

^^

And I’m saying 70% in response to your 1/100

stock market's mostly run by computers now, what do they care about reality TV?

It’s more like 70/100

you're saying the president singehandedly has control of 70% of stock market growth

No, I’m saying that out of everything that is responsible for it, his actions did most of the work. Think cause and effect

Him signing a bill causes a butterfly effect, ending in the stock market raising

And he’s responsible for 70% of all of these butterfly effects

Removing government regulation creates space for competition

Exactly

I've been trying to explain that

But he’s using tariffs and government control in order to control where we trade by encouraging trade on a national level, rather than an international level

You need intervention to even be able to maintain constant competition

Which helps the stocks

It’s not as much intervention as it is encouragement

For example back to the ISP problem

They aren't magically going to stop splitting territory

So? It honestly doesn’t matter. They aren’t holding a monopoly, as no single company is buying out others.

You'd need government intervention to stop the territory split so they can compete

So you’re saying that if the companies aren’t fighting eachother, the government should step in?

Hello what did I miss?

To keep competition? Yes

You shouldn’t force competition. If it doesn’t happen naturally, then so be it

Thats what created the problem to begin with

The reason it's not happening is because they deliberately avoid competition