Message from @Wrds
Discord ID: 410892431068758027
lol
You sort of have multiple "last points"
You brought up that trump is pushing to remove regulations out of nowhere which had nothing to do with what we were talking about
oh shit heres the ace attorney objections
Thats been the whole reason for the argument
This was originally about you claiming trump magically brought back 2.5 million jobs and raised stock market growth
Which is retarded because there's hundreds of factors when it comes to job growth and the stock market
Yes, and one of those factors is politics
Cool
That's 1 in a 100
Donald Trump’s actions led to the jobs being created, as well as the stock market growing. Lmao
Taking credit for stock market growth is stupid
You have to understand that the president signing trade deals, raising and lowering tariffs, and altering taxes play a good 70 percent into the stock markets growth, right?
I think this argument should stop, it is useless.
70%?
Like look at all that’s happening around us. Obama didn’t do this, so who did? Lol
Are you fucking serious?
Dead serious. Nothing goes into trade without it passing into the government first
^^
And I’m saying 70% in response to your 1/100
It’s more like 70/100
you're saying the president singehandedly has control of 70% of stock market growth
No, I’m saying that out of everything that is responsible for it, his actions did most of the work. Think cause and effect
Him signing a bill causes a butterfly effect, ending in the stock market raising
And he’s responsible for 70% of all of these butterfly effects
Removing government regulation creates space for competition
Exactly
I've been trying to explain that
But he’s using tariffs and government control in order to control where we trade by encouraging trade on a national level, rather than an international level
You need intervention to even be able to maintain constant competition
Which helps the stocks
It’s not as much intervention as it is encouragement
For example back to the ISP problem
They aren't magically going to stop splitting territory
So? It honestly doesn’t matter. They aren’t holding a monopoly, as no single company is buying out others.
You'd need government intervention to stop the territory split so they can compete
So you’re saying that if the companies aren’t fighting eachother, the government should step in?
Hello what did I miss?
To keep competition? Yes
You shouldn’t force competition. If it doesn’t happen naturally, then so be it