Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 621819447258382354
But that’s almost irrelevant atp
@Deleted User why not an anglosphere empire?
I really don’t care, as long as they uphold Truth.
Why not an Anglosphere North American state
Because Britain, Australia and New Zealand share ties as well @Taddesse
I want to re-unite all WESBS
Cool
But I was asking Mick
A M E R I C A N
A N N E X A T I O N
O F
C A N A D A
N O W
M A N I F E S T
D E S T I N Y
No. Unification of the Anglosphere
I would be okay with a spiritual union but I would oppose any political union in the United States
United States fought to be independent. I'd rather not undo that struggle with political union
Of any kind
Agreed
The only unification I support is a unification of north america under the stars and stripes
Mexico will probably throw a monkey wrench into that, though
Since beaner town
Wish we exterminated every last beaner back in 1848
Same. We should've yoinked the entire country instead of just the north
If I was Zachary Taylor I would have made Cortes's capture of Tenochtitlan look like a fucking walk in the park
Not a single moment of quarter for the eternal m*stizo
What Charles Dickens wanted to do to the Indians after the Indian rebellion of 1857 I'd have done to all non-white spics
Even the white spics who didn't speak English would have to be BTFO'd
"I wish I were Commander in Chief of India. The first thing I would do to strike that Oriental race with amazement (not in the least regarding them as if they lived in the Strand, London, or at Camden Town), should be to proclaim to them in their language, that I considered my Holding that appointment by the leave of God, to mean that I should do my utmost to exterminate the Race upon whom the stain of the late cruelties rested; and that I begged them to do me the favor to observe that I was there for that purpose and no other, and was now proceeding, which all convenient dispatch and merciful swiftness of execution, to blot it out of mankind and raze it off the face of the earth."
- Charles Dickens
Just so you understood the reference
Charles Dickens sounds based as fuck
Indeed he was
I don't see how Fascists can be pro-american revolution.
The founding fathers were gay af
Andrew Jackson was based
That's about it
So why oppose a political union if you aren't pro-founding fathers?
I support what they did, not what they thought
>don't see how fascists can be pro-American Revolution
>ignores how Founding Fathers created a hierarchical society, didn't believe in democracy, opposed reactionary monarchy, support westward expansion against Indians while British banned it
Also the American Revolution was very spiritual
A lot of it was a rebellion against the growing decadence of European establishmentarian Christianity, which is ironic given the current state of things but that spirit needs to be revived
"This we hold to be self-evident, that all men are created equal" . Britain in 1776 was hardly reactionary, it was a constitutional monarchy with only aristocrats in power. The US system was hardly better than that.
The US didn't rebel for christain reasons
Ok mutt
>The US didn't rebel for christain reasons
Cringe and bluepilled