I'm not sure if they were a little bit earlyier, there were actually several edicts that extended the citizenship progressively

So I'm just not sure if Dacia was included in the last one or earlyier

Should Burmese Way to Socialism be considered Third Positionist?

Nah

They were influenced by Ho chi Minh

They mixed Marxism with Buddhism. Plus Vietnamese Communism heavily nationalistic and has based aspects. So I'd consider them Third Positionist.

Ho Chi Minh was gay

If anyone from SEA was a third positionist is was Pol Pot

Just because it isn't all the way marxism it doesn't mean it's not red faggotry

Also pol pot was a brainlet

repent, 4 eyes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Di8fi7evjT8

<#604498949784469534> nigga

I'm serious tho

Why would you ever support pol pot

because he doesn't like glasses

He was objectively a shit leader

he was right

As i said

<#604498949784469534>

he started the anti 4 eyes revolution

I'd say Burmese Way to Socialism is no less if not more Third Positionist than Pol Potism.

National Theocratic Socialism

Pol Pot big ge

In regards to the North Korea poll, why isn't North Korea based?

How is it based?

Le epic brutalism and le epic starvation is based because they don't have jews xddddd

Not having jews is not inherently a good thing if your nation is a soulless shithole either way

Well their ideology is also Nationalist and anti-capitalist.

The whole economy exists to appease the ego of a fatass who didn't even live in his country for most of his life

@The Desert Fox V and where did it get them

fcking starving to death

*bUt ThEy'Re So BaSeD bEcAuSe ShLoMo IsN't ThErE*

Imagine the only good thing in your country is that theirs no kikes

And your staving

Iran is one of the few countries still not under rothschild control and they are much better economically than the DPRK

And dont have most basic ultilities

but civilisation in Iran is... kinda missing

persians were white up until the 8th century

debatable

they went through a lot damn